- Alyssa Ney
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Some philosophers argue that many contemporary debates in metaphysics are “illegitimate,” “shallow,” or “trivial,” and that “contemporary analytic metaphysics, a professional activity engaged in by some extremely intelligent and morally serious people, fails to qualify as part of the enlightened pursuit of objective truth, and should be discontinued” (Ladyman and Ross, Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalized, 2007). Many of these critics are explicit about their sympathies with Rudolf Carnap and his circle, calling themselves ‘neo-positivists’ or ‘neo-Carnapians.’ Yet despite the fact that one of the main conclusions of logical positivism was that metaphysical statements are meaningless, many of these neo-positivists are themselves engaged in metaphysical projects. This paper aims to clarify how we may see a neo-positivist metaphysics as proceeding in good faith, one that starts with serious engagement with the findings of science, particularly fundamental physics, but also has room for traditional, armchair methods.
- Albert, D. Z., & Ney, A. (Eds.). (forthcoming). The wave function: Essays in the metaphysics of quantum mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Allori, V., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., & Zanghi, N. (2008). On the common structure of Bohmian mechanics and Ghiradi–Rimini–Weber theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59, 353–389. CrossRef
- Belot, G. (forthcoming). Quantum states for primitive ontologists: A case study. European Journal for Philosophy of Science.
- Blackburn, S. (1984). Spreading the word. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Carnap, R. (1932/1959). Elimination of metaphysics through the logical analysis of language. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical positivism (pp. 60–81). New York: The Free Press.
- Carnap, R. (1934). The unity of science. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner, and Co.
- Carnap, R. (1950/1988). Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. In Meaning and necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Carnap, R. (1963). Intellectual autobiography. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (pp. 3–83). Chicago: Open Court.
- Carnap, R. (1984). On the character of philosophic problems. Philosophy of Science, 51(1), 5–19. CrossRef
- Chalmers, D. (2009). Ontological anti-realism. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics (pp. 77–129). Oxford: Oxford University.
- Chalmers, D., Manley, D., & Wasserman, R. (Eds.). (2009). Metametaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University.
- Colyvan, M. 2008. Indispensability arguments in the philosophy of mathematics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
- Dennett, D. (2005). Sweet dreams. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zanghi, N. (1992). Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty. Journal of Statistical Physics, 67, 1–75. CrossRef
- Field, H. (1980). Science without numbers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- French, S., & McKenzie, K. (forthcoming). Thinking outside the (tool)box: Toward a more productive engagement between metaphysics and philosophy of physics. The European Journal of Analytic Philosophy.
- Galison, P., & Stump, D. J. (Eds.). (1996). The disunity of science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Gibbard, A. (1990). Wise choices, apt feelings. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Greaves, H. (2007). Probability in the everett interpretation. Philosophy Compass, 2, 109–128. CrossRef
- Greene, B. (2004). The fabric of the cosmos. New York: Vintage.
- Griffiths, D. (2008). An introduction to elementary particles. New York: Wiley.
- Hawley, K. (2010). Symposium on every thing must go. Metascience, 19, 174–179.
- Hirsch, E. (2009). Ontology and alternative languages. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics (pp. 231–259). Oxford: Oxford University.
- Ladyman, J. (2007). Does physics answer metaphysical questions? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 61, 179–201. CrossRef
- Ladyman, J., & Ross, D. (2007). Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Loewer, B. (2001). From physics to physicalism. In C. Gillett & B. Loewer (Eds.), Physicalism and its discontents (pp. 37–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Maddy, P. (1992). Indispensability and practice. The Journal of Philosophy, 89, 251–289. CrossRef
- Maudlin, T. (2007). The metaphysics within physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Melnyk, A. (2003). A physicalist manifesto: Thoroughly modern materialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Ney, A. (forthcoming). Ontological reduction and the wave function ontology. In D. Z. Albert & A. Ney (Eds.), The wave function: Essays in the metaphysics of quantum mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Paul, L. A. (2012). Metaphysics as modeling: the handmaiden’s tale. Philosophical Studies. doi:10.1007/s11098-012-9906-7.
- Price, H. (2009). Metaphysics after Carnap: The ghost who walks? In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics (pp. 320–346). Oxford: Oxford University.
- Price, H. (2011). Naturalism without mirrors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Putnam, H. (1975). Philosophy of logic. In Mathematics, matter, and method. Philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 323–357). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Putnam, H. (1997). A half-century of philosophy: Viewed from within. Daedalus, 126(1), 175–208.
- Quine, W. V. O. (1948/1953). On what there is. In From a logical point of view. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Quine, W. V. O. (1951/1953). Two dogmas of empiricism. In From a logical point of view. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Quine, W. V. O. (1981). Success and limits of mathematics. In Theories and things (pp. 148–155). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., & Wallace, D. (Eds.). (2010). Many worlds? Everett, quantum theory, and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Smolin, L. (2007). The trouble with physics. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
- Soames, S. (2009). Ontology, analyticity, and meaning: The Quine–Carnap dispute. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics (pp. 424–443). Oxford: Oxford University.
- Van Fraassen, B. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Van Fraassen, B. (2002). The empirical stance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Wilson, J. (2011). Much ado about ‘something’. Analysis, 71(1), 172–188. CrossRef
- Neo-positivist metaphysics
Volume 160, Issue 1 , pp 53-78
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Indispensability arguments
- Alyssa Ney (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, University of Rochester, Box 270078, Rochester, NY, 14627-0078, USA