Semantic relationism, belief reports and contradiction
- Paolo Bonardi
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
In his book Semantic Relationism, Kit Fine propounds an original and sophisticated semantic theory called ‘semantic relationism’ or ‘relational semantics’, whose peculiarity is the enrichment of Kaplan’s, Salmon’s and Soames’ Russellian semantics (more specifically, the semantic content of simple sentences and the truth-conditions of belief reports) with coordination, “the very strongest relation of synonymy or being semantically the same”. In this paper, my goal is to shed light on an undesirable result of semantic relationism: a report like “Tom believes that Cicero is bald and Tom does not believe that Tully is bald” is correct according to Fine’s provided truth-conditions of belief reports, but its semantic content is (very likely) a contradiction. As I will argue in the paper, even the resort to the notion of token proposition, introduced in Fine’s recent article “Comments on Scott Soames’ ‘Coordination Problems’”, does not suffice to convincingly eliminate the contradiction; moreover, it raises new difficulties.
Supplementary Material (0)
- Braun, D., & Saul, J. (2002). Simple sentences, substitutions, and mistaken evaluations. Philosophical Studies, 111, 1–41.
- Fine, K. (2007). Semantic relationism. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossRef
- Fine, K. (2010). Comments on Scott Soames’ ‘Coordination problems’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81, 475–484. CrossRef
- Salmon, N. (1986). Frege’s puzzle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
- Salmon, N. (1989). Illogical belief. Philosophical Perspectives, 3, 243–285. CrossRef
About this Article
- Semantic relationism, belief reports and contradiction
Volume 166, Issue 2 , pp 273-284
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Semantic relationism
- Token propositions
- Belief reports
- Paolo Bonardi (1) (2)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
- 2. Department of Philosophy and Religion, Rutgers University, Camden, NJ, USA