The possibility of morality
- Phil Brown
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Despite much discussion over the existence of moral facts, metaethicists have largely ignored the related question of their possibility. This paper addresses the issue from the moral error theorist’s perspective, and shows how the arguments that error theorists have produced against the existence of moral facts at this world, if sound, also show that moral facts are impossible, at least at worlds non-morally identical to our own and, on some versions of the error theory, at any world. So error theorists’ arguments warrant a stronger conclusion than has previously been noticed. This may appear to make them vulnerable to counterarguments that take the possibility of moral facts as a premise. However, I show that any such arguments would be question-begging.
- Ayer, A. J. (1946). Language, truth, and logic (2nd ed.). London: Gollancz.
- Coons, C. (2011). How to prove that some acts are morally wrong (without using substantive moral premises). Philosophical Studies, 95, 83–98. CrossRef
- Cuneo, T. (2007). The normative Web. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Dreier, J. (2004). Meta-ethics and the problem of creeping minimalism. Philosophical Perspectives, 18, 23–44. CrossRef
- Jackson, F. (1998). From metaphysics to ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Joyce, R. (2001). The myth of morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Joyce, R. (2006). The evolution of morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Loeb, D. (2008). Moral incoherentism: How to pull a metaphysical rabbit out of a semantic hat. In W. Sinnot-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. London: Pelican Books.
- Olson, J. (2010). In defence of moral error theory. In M. Brady (Ed.), New waves in metaethics. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
- Streumer, B. (2008). Are there irreducibly normative properties? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86, 537–561. CrossRef
- Streumer, B. (2011). Are normative properties descriptive properties? Philosophical Studies.
- Streumer, B. (forthcoming). Can we believe the error theory? Journal of Philosophy.
- Sturgeon, N. (2009). Doubts about the supervenience of the evaluative. In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Oxford studies in metaethics (Vol. 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Williams, B. (1981). Internal and external reasons. In B. Williams (Ed.), Moral luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- The possibility of morality
Volume 163, Issue 3 , pp 627-636
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Moral error theory
- Moral realism
- Possible worlds
- Moral supervenience
- Phil Brown (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Philosophy, University of Manchester, Arthur Lewis Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK