Grades of individuality. A pluralistic view of identity in quantum mechanics and in the sciences
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper offers a critical assessment of the current state of the debate about the identity and individuality of material objects. Its main aim, in particular, is to show that, in a sense to be carefully specified, the opposition between the Leibnizian ‘reductionist’ tradition, based on discernibility, and the sort of ‘primitivism’ that denies that facts of identity and individuality must be analysable has become outdated. In particular, it is argued that—contrary to a widespread consensus—‘naturalised’ metaphysics supports both the acceptability of non-qualitatively grounded (both ‘contextual’ and intrinsic) identity and a pluralistic approach to individuality and individuation. A case study is offered that focuses on non-relativistic quantum mechanics, in the context of which primitivism about identity and individuality, rather than being regarded as unscientific, is on the contrary suggested to be preferable to the complicated forms of reductionism that have recently been proposed. More generally, by assuming a plausible form of anti-reductionism about scientific theories and domains, it is claimed that science can be regarded as compatible with, or even as suggesting, the existence of a series of equally plausible grades of individuality. The kind of individuality that prevails in a certain context and at a given level can be ascertained only on the basis of the specific scientific theory at hand.
- Adams, R. M. (1979). Primitive thisness and primitive identity. Journal of Philosophy, 76, 5–25. CrossRef
- Ayer, A. J. (1954). The identity of the indiscernibles, in philosophical essays. London: MacMillan.
- Batterman, R. W. (2002). The devil in the details. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Brody, B. (1980). Identity and essence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Black, M. (1952). The identity of indiscernibles. Mind, 61, 153–164.
- Butterfield, J. (1989). The hole truth. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 40, 1–28. CrossRef
- Butterfield, J. (1993). Interpretation and identity in quantum theory. Studies in history and Philosophy of Science, 24, 443–476. CrossRef
- Church, A. (1956). Introduction to mathematical logic (Vol. I). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Daumer, M., Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zanghì, N. (1996). Naïve realism about operators. Erkenntnis, 45, 379–397.
- Dieks, D., & Versteegh, M. (2008). Identical quantum particles and weak discernibility. Foundations of Physics, 38, 923–934. CrossRef
- Dizadji-Bahmani, F., Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2010). Who’s afraid of nagelian reduction? Erkenntnis, 73, 393–412. CrossRef
- Dorato, M., & Pauri, M. (2006). Holism and structuralism in classical and quantum general relativity. In D. Rickles, S. French, & J. Saatsi (Eds.), Structural foundations of quantum gravity (pp. 121–151). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Earman, J., & Norton, J. D. (1987). What price space-time substantivalism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 38, 515–525. CrossRef
- French, S., & Redhead, M. (1988). Quantum mechanics and the identity of the indiscernibles. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39, 233–246. CrossRef
- Hacking, I. (1975). The identity of indiscernibles. Journal of Philosophy, 72, 249–256. CrossRef
- Hawley, K. (2009). Identity and indiscernibility. Mind, 118, 101–119. CrossRef
- Howard, D. (1997). A peek behind the Veil of Maya: Einstein, Schopenhauer, and the historical background of the conception of space as a ground for the individuation of physical systems. In J. Earman & J. Norton (Eds.), The cosmos of science: Essays of exploration, Pittsburgh–Konstanz series in the philosophy and history of science (Vol. 6, pp. 87–150). Pittsburgh and Universitätsverlag, Konstanz: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Huggett, N. (2003). Quarticles and the identity of the indiscernibles. In K. Brading & E. Castellani (Eds.), Symmetries in physics: Philosophical reflections (pp. 239–249). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Katz, B. D. (1983). The identity of the indiscernibles revisited. Philosophical Studies, 44, 37–44. CrossRef
- Ladyman, J. (2007). Scientific structuralism: On the identity and diversity of objects in a structure. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 81, 23–43. CrossRef
- Ladyman, J., & Bigaj, T. (2010). The principle of the identity of indiscernibles and quantum mechanics. Philosophy of Science, 77, 117–136. CrossRef
- Morganti, M. (2009). Inherent properties and statistics with individual particles in quantum mechanics. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 40, 223–231. CrossRef
- Muller, F. A., & Saunders, S. (2008). Discerning fermions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59, 499–548. CrossRef
- Muller, F. A., & Seevinck, M. P. (2009). Discerning elementary particles. Philosophy of Science., 76, 179–200. CrossRef
- O’Leary-Hawthorne, J. (1995). The bundle theory of substance and the identity of the indiscernibles. Analysis, 55, 191–196. CrossRef
- Odegard, D. (1964). Indiscernibles. Philosophical Quarterly, 14, 204–213. CrossRef
- Post, H., (1963): Individuality in physics, in The Listener, 70, 534-537, reprinted in 1973 in Vedanta for East and West, 32, 14–22.
- Quine, W.v. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Quine, W.v. O. (1976). Grades of discriminability. Journal of Philosophy, 73, 113–116. CrossRef
- Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. (2006). How not to trivialise the identity of the indiscernibles. In P. F. Strawson & A. Chakrabarti (Eds.), Universals, concepts and qualities: New essays on the meaning of predicates (pp. 205–224). London: Ashgate.
- Saunders, S. (2006). Are quantum particles objects? Analysis, 66, 52–63. CrossRef
- Stachel, J. (1993). The meaning of general covariance. In J. Earman, A. Janis, G. Massey, & N. Rescher (Eds.), Philosophical problems of the internal and external worlds: Essays on the philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum (pp. 129–160). Pittsburgh and Universitätsverlag, Konstanz: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Whitehead, A. N., & Russell, B. (1925). Principia mathematica (Vol. I). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Grades of individuality. A pluralistic view of identity in quantum mechanics and in the sciences
Volume 163, Issue 3 , pp 591-610
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Quantum mechanics