Dubious objections from iterated conjunctions
- Matthew A. Benton
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The knowledge account of assertion (KAA)—roughly: one should not assert what one does not know—can explain a variety of Moorean conjunctions, a fact often cited as evidence in its favor. David Sosa has objected that the account does not generalize satisfactorily, since it cannot explain the infelicity of certain iterated conjunctions without appealing to the controversial “KK” principle. This essay responds by showing how the knowledge account can handle such conjunctions without use of the KK principle.
- DeRose, K. (1991). Epistemic possibilities. The Philosophical Review, 100, 581–605. CrossRef
- DeRose, K. (2002). Assertion, knowledge, and context. The Philosophical Review, 111, 167–203.
- DeRose, K. (2009). The case for contextualism. Oxford: Clarendon Press. CrossRef
- Hawthorne, J. (2004). Knowledge and lotteries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Moore, G. E. (1962). Commonplace book: 1919–1953. London: George Allen and Unwin.
- Sosa, D. (2009). Dubious assertions. Philosophical Studies, 146, 269–272. CrossRef
- Turri, J. (2011). The express knowledge account of assertion. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89, 37–45. CrossRef
- Unger, P. (1975). Ignorance: A defense of skepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Dubious objections from iterated conjunctions
Volume 162, Issue 2 , pp 355-358
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Norms of assertion
- Knowledge account
- G. E. Moore
- D. Sosa
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Philosophy Department, Rutgers University, 1 Seminary Place, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA