Philosophical Studies

, Volume 161, Issue 3, pp 367–379

Stage theory and proper names


DOI: 10.1007/s11098-011-9743-0

Cite this article as:
Rychter, P. Philos Stud (2012) 161: 367. doi:10.1007/s11098-011-9743-0


In the contemporary debate about the nature of persistence, stage theory is the view that ordinary objects (artefacts, animals, persons, etc.) are instantaneous and “persist” by being suitably related to other instantaneous objects. In this paper I focus on the issue of what stage theorists should say about the semantics of ordinary proper names, like ‘Socrates’ or ‘London’. I consider the remarks that stage theorists actually make about this issue, present some problems they face, and finally offer what I take to be the best alternative available for them.


Stage theoryPersistencePerdurantismCounterpart theoryProper names

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departament de Metafísica i Teoria del ConeixementUniversitat de ValènciaValènciaSpain