Semantic plasticity and epistemicism
- Adam Sennet
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper considers the connections between semantic shiftiness (plasticity), epistemic safety and an epistemic theory of vagueness as presented and defended by Williamson (1996a, b, 1997a, b). Williamson explains ignorance of the precise intension of vague words as rooted in insensitivity to semantic shifts: one’s inability to detect small shifts in intension for a vague word results in a lack of knowledge of the word’s intension. Williamson’s explanation, however, falls short of accounting for ignorance of intension.
- Hawthorne, J. (2006). Epistemicism and semantic plasticity. In J. Hawthorne (Ed.), Metaphysical essays (pp. 185–210). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Kearns, S., & Magidor, O. (2008). Epistemicism about vagueness and meta-linguistic safety. Philosophical Perspectives, 22, 277–304. CrossRef
- Lewis, D. (1997). Finkish dispositions. The Philosophical Quarterly, 47(187), 143–158. CrossRef
- Williamson, T. (1996a). Wright on the epistemic conception of vagueness. Analysis, 56(1), 39–45. CrossRef
- Williamson, T. (1996b). Vagueness. London: Routledge.
- Williamson, T. (1997a). Reply to commentators. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57(4), 945–953. CrossRef
- Williamson, T. (1997b). Reply to commentators. Philosophical Issues, 8, 255–265. CrossRef
- Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Weatherson, B. (unpub-a). Three objections to smith on vagueness.
- Weatherson, B. (unpub-b). Vagueness without toleration: Reply to Greenbough.
- Semantic plasticity and epistemicism
Volume 161, Issue 2 , pp 273-285
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Adam Sennet (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA