Achinstein, P. (1994). Stronger evidence. Philosophy of Science,
Achinstein, P. (2000). Why philosophical theories of evidence are (and ought to be) ignored by scientists. Philosophy of Science,
Alexander, J. (2010). Is experimental philosophy philosophically significant? Philosophical Psychology,
Alexander, J., & Weinberg, J. (2007). Analytic epistemology and experimental philosophy. Philosophy Compass,
Baumeister, R. (2008). Free will in scientific psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science,
Bealer, G. (1998). Intuition and the autonomy of philosophy. In M. DePaul & W. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry (pp. 201–239). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bonjour, L. (1998). In defense of pure reason: A rationalist account of a priori justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bouchard, T. J. (1994). Genes, environment, and personality. Science,
Bratman, M. (1984). Two faces of intention. The Philosophical Review,
Buckwalter, W., & Stich, S. (2011). Gender and the philosophy club. The Philosophers’ Magazine, 52, 60–65.
Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (2009a). Individual differences, judgment biases, and Theory-of-Mind: Deconstructing the intentional action side effect asymmetry. Journal of Research in Personality,
, 18–24. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.007
Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (2009b). Adaptive variation in folk judgment and philosophical intuition. Consciousness and Cognition,
, 355–357. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.01.001
Cokely, E. T., & Kelley, C. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making,
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Daniels, N. (1979). Wide reflective equilibrium and theory acceptance in ethics. Journal of Philosophy,
Davidson, D. (1987). Knowing one’s own mind. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association,
Deutsch, M. (2010). Intuitions, counter-examples, and experimental philosophy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology,
Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptations to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology,
Ericsson, K. A., Prietula, M. J., & Cokely, E. T. (2007). The making of an expert. Harvard Business Review,
Feltz, A. (2008). Problems with the appeal to intuition in epistemology. Philosophical Explorations,
Feltz, A. (2009). Experimental philosophy. Analyse & Kritik,
Feltz, A., & Bishop, M. (2010). The proper role of intuitions in epistemology. In M. Milkowski & K. Talmont-Kaminski (Eds.), Beyond description: Normativity in naturalised philosophy (pp. 101–122). London: College Publications.
Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2008). The fragmented folk: More evidence of stable individual differences in moral judgments and folk intuitions. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1771–1776). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2009). Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are? Personality differences intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism. Consciousness and Cognition,
, 342–350. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.08.001
Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. (in press). Individual differences and theory-of-mind judgments: Side effects and order effects. Philosophical Psychology.
Frankfurt, H. (1969). Alternative possibilities and moral responsibility. The Journal of Philosophy,
Funder, D. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology,
Funder, D. (2006). Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality,
Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Moral intuition = fast and frugal heuristic? In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral Psychology. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (Vol. 2, pp. 1–26). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & Group, T. A. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldman, A., & Pust, J. (1998). Philosophical theory and intuitional evidence. In W. R. M. DePaul (Ed.), Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry (pp. 179–197). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Goodman, N. (1955). Fact, fiction, and forecast. New York: Bobbs-Merrill Company.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Haidt, J., Bjorklund, F., & Murphy, S. (2000). Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia.
Haidt, J., Koller, S., & Dias, M. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Horvarth, J. (2010). How (not) to react to experimental philosophy. Philosophical Psychology,
Huebner, B., Bruno, M., & Sarkissian, H. (2010). What does the nation of China think about phenomenal states? Review of Philosophy and Psychology,
Jackson, F. (1998). From metaphysics to ethics: A defense of conceptual analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jang, K., Livesley, W., & Vernon, P. (1996). Heritability of the Big Five personality dimensions and their facets: A twin study. Journal of Personality,
John, O. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 66–100). New York: Guilford.
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice—Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist,
Kauppinen, A. (2007). The rise and fall of experimental philosophy. Philosophical Explorations,
Knobe, J., & Nichols, S. (2008). An experimental philosophy manifesto. In J. Knobe & S. Nichols (Eds.), Experimental philosophy (pp. 3–14). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kornblith, H. (1998). The role of intuition in philosophical inquiry: An account with no unnatural ingredients. In M. DePaul & W. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry (pp. 129–141). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument
. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Livengood, J., Sytsma, J., Feltz, A., Scheines, R., & Machery, E. (2010). Philosophical temperament. Philosophical Psychology,
, 313–330. doi:10.1080/09515089.2010.490941
Ludwig, K. (2007). The epistemology of thought experiments: First vs. third person approaches. Midwest Studies in Philosophy,
Ludwig, K. (2010). Intuitions and relativity. Philosophical Psychology,
Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. P. (2004). Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition,
Maher, P. (1996). Subjective and objective confirmation. Philosophy of Science,
McCrae, R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin,
Miller, J., & Feltz, A. (in press). Frankfurt and the folk: An experimental investigation of Frankfurt-style cases. Consciousness and Cognition
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review,
Nadelhoffer, T., & Feltz, A. (2008). The actor-observer bias and moral intuitions: Adding fuel to Sinnott-Armstrong’s fire. Neuroethics,
, 133–144. doi:10.1007/s12152-008-9015-7
Nadelhoffer, T., Kvaran, T., & Nahmias, E. (2009). Temperament and intuition: A commentary on Feltz and Cokely. Consciousness and Cognition,
Nadelhoffer, T., & Nahmias, E. (2007). The past and future of experimental philosophy. Philosophical Explorations,
Nahmias, E. (2007). Autonomous agency and social psychology. In M. Marraffa, M. Cardero, & F. Ferretti (Eds.), Cartographies of the mind: Philosophy and psychology in intersection (pp. 169–185). Berlin: Springer.
Nichols, S. (2004). Folk concepts and intuitions: From philosophy to cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
Nisbett, R., & Wilson, T. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review,
Prinz, J. (2007). The emotional construction of morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pust, J. (2000). Intuitions as evidence. New York: Garland.
Pust, J. (2001). Against explanationist skepticism regarding philosophical intuitions. Philosophical Studies,
Schulz, E., Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A., (in press). A test of the expertise defense: Persistent bias in expert judgments about free will and moral responsibility. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.04.007
Schwitzgebel, E. (2009). Do ethicists steal more books? Philosophical Psychology,
Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J. (2010a). Do ethicists and political philosophers vote more often than other professors? Review of Philosophy and Psychology,
Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J. (2010b). The moral behavior of ethicists: Peer opinion. Mind,
Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2008). Framing moral intuitions. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology. The Cognitive Science of Morality (Vol. 2, pp. 47–76). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sosa, E. (2007a). Intuitions: Their nature and epistemic efficacy. Grazer Philosophische Studien,
Sosa, E. (2007b). Experimental philosophy and philosophical intuition. Philosophical Studies,
Sosa, E. (2009). A defense of the use of intuitions in philosophy. In M. Bishop & D. Murphy (Eds.), Stich and his critics (pp. 101–112). Oxford: Wiley.
Sosa, E. (2010). Intuitions and meaning divergence. Philosophical Psychology,
Stich, S. (1990). The fragmentation of reason. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Stich, S. (1998). Reflective equilibrium, analytic epistemology, and the problem of cognitive diversity. In M. Depaul & W. Ramsey (Eds.), Rethinking intuition: The psychology of intuition and its role in philosophical inquiry (pp. 95–112). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Stich, S. (2010, May). Experimental philosophy and the bankruptcy of “The Great Tradition.” In Experimental philosophy workshop, Wroclaw, Poland.
Swain, S., Alexander, J., & Weinberg, J. (2008). The instability of philosophical intuitions: Running hot and cold on truetemp. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,
Weinberg, J. (2007). How to challenge intuitions empirically without risking skepticism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy,
Weinberg, J., Alexander, J., & Gonnerman, C. (2008). Unstable intuitions and need for cognition: How being thoughtful somtimes just means being wrong in a different way. Paper presented at the Soceity for Philosophy and Psychology.
Weinberg, J., & Crowley, S. (2009). Loose constitutivity and armchair philosophy. Studia Philosophica Estonica,
Weinberg, J., Gonnerman, C., Buckner, C., & Alexander, J. (2010). Are philosophers expert intuiters? Philosophical Psychology,
Weinberg, J., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2001). Normativity and epistemic intuitions. Philosophical Topics,
Williamson, T. (2007). The philosophy of philosophy
. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRef
Williamson, T. (in press). Philosophical expertise and the burden of proof. Metaphilosophy.