Presentism, and speaking of the dead
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- McKinnon, N. & Bigelow, J. Philos Stud (2012) 160: 253. doi:10.1007/s11098-011-9717-2
- 241 Downloads
Presentists standardly conform to the eternalist’s paradigm of treating all cases of property-exemplification as involving a single relation of instantiation. This, we argue, results in a much less parsimonious and philosophically explanatory picture than is possible if other alternatives are considered. We argue that by committing to primitive past and future tensed instantiation ties, presentists can make gains in both economy and explanatory power. We show how this metaphysical picture plays out in cases where an individual exists to partake in facts about its past and future, and also in cases where that individual no longer exists, and proxies (or surrogates) for that thing must be found.