Perceiving and desiring: a new look at the cognitive penetrability of experience
- Dustin Stokes
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper considers an orectic penetration hypothesis (OPH) which says that desires and desire-like states may influence perceptual experience in a non-externally mediated way. This hypothesis is clarified with a definition, which serves further to distinguish the interesting target phenomenon from trivial and non-genuine instances of desire-influenced perception. Orectic penetration is an interesting possible case of the cognitive penetrability of perceptual experience. The OPH is thus incompatible with the more common thesis that perception is cognitively impenetrable. It is of importance to issues in the philosophy of mind and cognitive science, epistemology, and general philosophy of science. The plausibility of orectic penetration can be motivated by some classic experimental studies, and some new experimental research inspired by those same studies. The general suggestion is that orectic penetration thus defined, and evidenced by the relevant studies, cannot be deflected by the standard strategies of the cognitive impenetrability theorist.
- Armstrong, D. (1980). The nature of the mind. St. Lucia, QLD: University of Queensland Press.
- Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2006). See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 612–625. CrossRef
- Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2010). Wishful seeing: Desired objects are seen as closer. Psychological Science, 21, 147–152. CrossRef
- Blum, A. (1957). The value factor in children’s size perception. Child Development, 28, 14–18.
- Brewer, W. F., & Lambert, B. L. (2001). The theory-ladenness of observation and the theory-ladenness of the rest of the scientific process. Philosophy of Science, 68, 176–186. CrossRef
- Bruner, J. S., & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42, 33–44. CrossRef
- Bruner, J. S., & Postman, L. (1948). Symbolic value as an organizing factor in perception. Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 203–208. CrossRef
- Bruner, J. S., & Rodrigues, J. S. (1953). Some determinants of apparent size. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 17–24. CrossRef
- Carter, L. F., & Schooler, K. (1949). Value need and other factors in perception. Psychological Review, 56, 200–207. CrossRef
- Churchland, P. M. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Churchland, P. M. (1988). Perceptual plasticity and theoretical neutrality: A reply to Jerry Fodor. Philosophy of Science, 55, 167–187. CrossRef
- Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective: The nature of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Delk, J. L., & Fillenbaum, S. (1965). Differences in perceived colour as a function of characteristic color. The American Journal of Psychology, 78, 290–293. CrossRef
- Dukes, W. F., & Bevan, W. (1952). Size estimation and monetary value: A correlation. Journal of Psychology, 34, 43–53. CrossRef
- Epstein, S. (1961). Food-related responses to ambiguous stimuli as a function of hunger and ego strength. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25, 463–469. CrossRef
- Feyerabend, P. (1962). Explanation, reduction and empiricism. In H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota studies in philosophy of science (Vol. 3, pp. 28–97). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
- Fodor, J. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Fodor, J. (1984). Observation reconsidered. Philosophy of Science, 51, 23–43. CrossRef
- Fodor, J. (1985). Précis of the modularity of mind. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 1–5. CrossRef
- Fodor, J. (1988). A reply to Churchland’s ‘Perceptual plasticity and theoretical neutrality’. Philosophy of Science, 55, 19–188. CrossRef
- Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hanson, N. R. (1969). Perception and discovery: An introduction to scientific inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Freeman and Cooper.
- Holzkamp, K., & Perlwitz, E. (1966). Absolute oder relative Größenakzentuierung? Eine experimentelle Studie zur sozialen Wahrnehmung. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 13, 390–405.
- Jenkin, N. (1957). Affective processes in perception. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 100–127. CrossRef
- Klein, G. S., Schlesinger, H. J., & Meister, D. E. (1951). The effect of personal values on perception—An experimental critique. Psychological Review, 58, 96–112. CrossRef
- Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Lazarus, R. S., Yosem, H., & Arenberg, A. (1953). Hunger and perception. Journal of Personality, 21, 312–328. CrossRef
- Lysak, W., & Gilchrist, J. C. (1955). Value, equivocality, and goal availability as determinants of size judgments. Journal of Personality, 23, 500–501.
- Macpherson, F. (forthcoming). Cognitive penetration of colour experience: Rethinking the issue in light of an indirect mechanism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
- McCurdy, H. G. (1956). Coin perception studies and the concept of schemata. Psychological Review, 63, 160–168. CrossRef
- Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450. CrossRef
- Pylyshyn, Z. (1984). Computation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(3), 341–365.
- Saugstad, P. (1966). Effect of food deprivation on perception-cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 80–90. CrossRef
- Saugstad, P. (1967). Comments on the article by David L. Wolitzky. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 345–346. CrossRef
- Schroeder, T. (2004). Three faces of desire. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Siegel, S. (forthcoming). Cognitive penetrability and perceptual justification. Nous.
- Smith, M. (1994). The moral problem. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
- Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Stalnaker, R. (1984). Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Stokes, D., & Bergeron, V. (unpublished manuscript). A dilemma for modular architectures of the mind.
- Tajfel, H. (1957). Value and the perceptual judgment of magnitude. Psychological Review, 64, 192–204. CrossRef
- Tajfel, H., & Wilkes, A. L. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgment. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 101–114. CrossRef
- van Ulzen, N. R., Semin, G. R., Oudejans, R., & Beek, P. (2008). Affective stimulus properties influence size perception and the Ebbinghaus illusion. Psychological Research, 72, 304–310. CrossRef
- Wolitzky, D. L. (1967). Effect of food deprivation on perception-cognition: A comment. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 342–344. CrossRef
- Perceiving and desiring: a new look at the cognitive penetrability of experience
Volume 158, Issue 3 , pp 477-492
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Cognitive penetrability
- Dustin Stokes (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto, 170 St. George St., Toronto, ON, M5R 2M8, Canada