Vicissitudes of non-visual objects: Comments on Macpherson, O’Callaghan, and Batty Article First Online: 03 November 2010 DOI:
Cite this article as: Clark, A. Philos Stud (2011) 153: 175. doi:10.1007/s11098-010-9640-y Abstract
The papers by Macpherson, O’Callaghan, and Batty reveal some startling differences in the objects and properties represented by different modalities. They also reveal some tensions between different ways of understanding what it is for any one modality to represent objects and properties.
Keywords Perception Representation Intentional object Illusion References
Clark, A. (2000).
A theory of sentience
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodman, N. (1977).
The structure of appearance
(3rd ed.). Boston: Dordrecht Reidel.
Pylyshyn, Z. (2001). Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision.
CrossRef Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. (2003).
Seeing and visualizing: It’s not what you think
. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sellars, W. (1981). Naturalism and process.
Google Scholar Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010