What must a proof of incompatibilism prove?
- Seth Shabo
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Peter van Inwagen has developed two highly influential strategies for establishing incompatibilism about causal determinism and moral responsibility. These have come to be known as ‘the Direct Argument’ and ‘the Indirect Argument,’ respectively. In recent years, the two arguments have attracted closely related criticisms. In each case, it is claimed, the argument does not provide a fully general defense of the incompatibilist’s conclusion. While the critics are right to notice these arguments’ limitations, they have not made it clear what the problem with the arguments is supposed to be. I suggest three possibilities, arguing that none proves to be well founded. I conclude that the scope of these arguments is fully adequate for their defenders’ purposes.
- Brueckner, A (2008) Retooling the consequence argument. Analysis 68: pp. 10-13 CrossRef
- Campbell, JK (2007) Free will and the necessity of the past. Analysis 67: pp. 105-111
- Campbell, JK (2008) Reply to Brueckner. Analysis 68: pp. 264-269
- Fischer, J. M. (2004). The transfer of non-responsibility. In J. Campbell, M. O’Rourke, D. Shiers (Eds.), Freedom and determinism: Topics in contemporary philosophy series (pp. 189–210). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press. (Reprinted in and cited from Fischer, My way: Essays on moral responsibility, pp. 159–174, 2006, New York: Oxford University Press.)
- Frankfurt, H (1969) Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. Journal of Philosophy 66: pp. 829-839 CrossRef
- McKay, T, Johnson, D (1996) A reconsideration of an argument for incompatibilism. Philosophical Topics 24: pp. 113-122
- McKenna, M (2001) Source incompatibilism, ultimacy, and the transfer of non-responsibility. American Philosophical Quarterly 38: pp. 37-52
- Ravizza, M (1994) Semi-compatibilism and the transfer of non-responsibility. Philosophical Studies 75: pp. 61-93 CrossRef
- Shabo, S. (2009). The fate of the direct argument and the case for incompatibilism. Philosophical Studies. doi:10.1007/s11098-009-9419-1.
- Shabo, S. (2010). Uncompromising source incompatibilism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 80, 349–383.
- Stump, E (2000) The direct argument for incompatibilism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61: pp. 459-466 CrossRef
- van Inwagen, P (1983) An essay on free will. Clarendon Press, Oxford
- van Inwagen, P (1989) When is the will free?. Philosophical Perspectives 3: pp. 399-422 CrossRef
- van Inwagen, P (2000) Free will remains a mystery. Philosophical Perspectives 14: pp. 1-19
- Warfield, T (2000) Causal determinism and human freedom are incompatible: A new argument for incompatibilism. Philosophical Perspectives 14: pp. 167-180
- What must a proof of incompatibilism prove?
Volume 154, Issue 3 , pp 361-371
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Direct Argument
- Indirect Argument
- Seth Shabo (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, University of Alabama, 336 ten Hoor Hall, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA