Revisionism about free will: a statement & defense Authors
First Online: 21 March 2009 DOI:
Cite this article as: Vargas, M. Philos Stud (2009) 144: 45. doi:10.1007/s11098-009-9366-x Abstract
This article summarizes and extends the moderate revisionist position I put forth in
Four Views on Free Will and responds to objections to it from Robert Kane, John Martin Fischer, Derk Pereboom, and Michael McKenna. Among the principle topics of the article are (1) motivations for revisionism, what it is, and how it is different from compatibilism and hard incompatibilism, (2) an objection to libertarianism based on the moral costs of its current epistemic status, (3) an objection to the distinctiveness of semicompatibilism against conventional forms of compatibilism, and (4) whether moderate revisionism is committed to realism about moral responsibility. Keywords Free will Moral responsibility Revisionism Compatibilism Libertarianism Hard incompatibilism References
Doris, J., Knobe, J., & Woolfolk, R. L. (2007). Variantism about moral responsibility.
Fischer, J. M., Kane, R., Pereboom, D., & Vargas, M. (2007).
Four views on free will. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Honderich, T. (1988).
A theory of determinism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kane, R. (1996).
The significance of free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knobe, J., & Doris, J. (in press).
Strawsonian variations: Folk morality and the search for a unified theory. The handbook of moral psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McKenna, M. (2008). Compatibilism and desert: Critical comments on
four views on free will. In 2008 Pacific division meeting of the American Philosophical Association.
McKenna, M. (this issue). Compatibilism & desert: Critical comments on
four views on free will
Nahmias, E., Morris, S., Nadelhoffer, T., & Turner, J. (2006). Is incompatibilism intuitive?
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,
Nelkin, D. (2007). Do we have a coherent set of intuitions about moral responsibility?
Midwest Studies in Philosophy,
Nichols, S. (2007). After incompatibilism: A naturalistic defense of the reactive attitudes.
Nichols, S., & Knobe, J. (2007). Moral responsibility and determinism: The cognitive science of folk intuitions.
Pereboom, D. (2001).
Living without free will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smart, J. J. C. (1961). Free will, praise, and blame.
Smilansky, S. (2000).
Free will and illusion. New York: Clarendon.
Strawson, G. (1994). The impossibility of moral responsibility.
Vargas, M. (2004). Libertarianism and skepticism about free will: Some arguments against both.
Vargas, M. (2005a). The revisionist’s guide to responsibility.
Vargas, M. (2005b). Compatibilism evolves? On some varieties of Dennett worth wanting.
CrossRef Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009