Revisionism about free will: a statement & defense
- Manuel Vargas
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This article summarizes and extends the moderate revisionist position I put forth in Four Views on Free Will and responds to objections to it from Robert Kane, John Martin Fischer, Derk Pereboom, and Michael McKenna. Among the principle topics of the article are (1) motivations for revisionism, what it is, and how it is different from compatibilism and hard incompatibilism, (2) an objection to libertarianism based on the moral costs of its current epistemic status, (3) an objection to the distinctiveness of semicompatibilism against conventional forms of compatibilism, and (4) whether moderate revisionism is committed to realism about moral responsibility.
- Doris, J., Knobe, J., & Woolfolk, R. L. (2007). Variantism about moral responsibility. Philosophical Perspectives, 21(1), 121–183.
- Fischer, J. M., Kane, R., Pereboom, D., & Vargas, M. (2007). Four views on free will. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Honderich, T. (1988). A theory of determinism. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Kane, R. (1996). The significance of free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Knobe, J., & Doris, J. (in press). Strawsonian variations: Folk morality and the search for a unified theory. The handbook of moral psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- McKenna, M. (2008). Compatibilism and desert: Critical comments on four views on free will. In 2008 Pacific division meeting of the American Philosophical Association.
- McKenna, M. (this issue). Compatibilism & desert: Critical comments on four views on free will. Philosophical Studies. doi:10.1007/s11098-009-9373-y.
- Nahmias, E., Morris, S., Nadelhoffer, T., & Turner, J. (2006). Is incompatibilism intuitive? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73(1), 28–53. CrossRef
- Nelkin, D. (2007). Do we have a coherent set of intuitions about moral responsibility? Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 31, 243–259. CrossRef
- Nichols, S. (2007). After incompatibilism: A naturalistic defense of the reactive attitudes. Philosophical Perspectives, 21, 405–428.
- Nichols, S., & Knobe, J. (2007). Moral responsibility and determinism: The cognitive science of folk intuitions. Nous, 41(4), 663–685. CrossRef
- Pereboom, D. (2001). Living without free will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Smart, J. J. C. (1961). Free will, praise, and blame. Mind, 70, 291–306. CrossRef
- Smilansky, S. (2000). Free will and illusion. New York: Clarendon.
- Strawson, G. (1994). The impossibility of moral responsibility. Philosophical Studies, 75, 5–24. CrossRef
- Vargas, M. (2004). Libertarianism and skepticism about free will: Some arguments against both. Philosophical Topics, 32(1&2), 403–426.
- Vargas, M. (2005a). The revisionist’s guide to responsibility. Philosophical Studies, 125(3), 399–429. CrossRef
- Vargas, M. (2005b). Compatibilism evolves? On some varieties of Dennett worth wanting. Metaphilosophy, 36(4), 460–475. CrossRef
- Revisionism about free will: a statement & defense
Volume 144, Issue 1 , pp 45-62
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Free will
- Moral responsibility
- Hard incompatibilism
- Manuel Vargas (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Philosophy Department, University of San Francisco, 2130 Fulton St., San Francisco, CA, 94117, USA