The possibility of pragmatic reasons for belief and the wrong kind of reasons problem
- Andrew Reisner
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
In this paper I argue against the stronger of the two views concerning the right and wrong kind of reasons for belief, i.e. the view that the only genuine normative reasons for belief are evidential. The project in this paper is primarily negative, but with an ultimately positive aim. That aim is to leave room for the possibility that there are genuine pragmatic reasons for belief. Work is required to make room for this view, because evidentialism of a strict variety remains the default view in much of the debate concerning normative reasons for belief. Strict versions of evidentialism are inconsistent with the view that there are genuine pragmatic reasons for belief.
- Adler, J. (2002). Belief’s own ethics. Cambridge: Bradford Books.
- Danielsson, S., Olson, J. (2007). Brentano and buck-passers. Mind, 116, 511–522. CrossRef
- Hájek, A. (2003). Waging war on Pascal’s wager. Philosophical Review, 112, 27–56. CrossRef
- Harman, G. (1999). Rationality. In Reasoning, meaning, and mind (pp. 9–45). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Hieronymi, P. (2005). The wrong kind of reason. The Journal of Philosophy, 102, 437–457.
- Hookway C. (2000). Epistemic norms and theoretical deliberation. In J. Dancy (Ed.), Normativity (pp. 60–77). Oxford, Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
- Kelly, T. (2002). The rationality of belief and some other propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophical Research, 110, 163–196.
- Olson, J. (2004). Buck-passing and the wrong kind of reasons. The Philosophical Quarterly, 54, 295–300. CrossRef
- Parfit, D. (2001). Reasons and rationality. In D. Egonsson, J. Josefsson, B. Petersson, & T. Rønnow-Rasmussen (Eds.), Exploring practical rationality (pp. 17–39). Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Rabinowicz, W., & Rønnow-Rasmussen, T. (2004). The strike of the demon: On fitting pro-attitudes and value. Ethics, 114, 391–423. CrossRef
- Railton, P. (1994). Truth, reason, and the regulation of belief. Philosophical Issues, 5, 71–93. CrossRef
- Reisner, A. (2007). Evidentialism and the numbers game. Theoria, 73, 304–316. CrossRef
- Reisner, A. (2008). Weighing pragmatic and evidential reasons for belief. Philosophical Studies, 138, 17–27. CrossRef
- Shah, N. (2006). A new argument for evidentialism. The Philosophical Quarterly, 56, 481–498. CrossRef
- Skorupski, J. (1997). Reason and reasons. In G. Cullity & B. Gaut (Eds.), Ethics and practical reason (pp. 345–368). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Skorupski, J. (forthcoming). The unity and diversity of reasons. In S. Robertson & J. Timmermann (Eds.), Spheres of reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Steglich-Petersen, A. (2006). No norm needed: on the aim of belief. The Philosophical Quarterly, 56, 499–516. CrossRef
- Stratton-Lake, P. (2005). How to deal with evil demons: Comment on Rabinowicz and Rønnow-Rasmussen. Ethics, 115, 788–799. CrossRef
- Stroud, S. (2006). Epistemic partiality and friendship. Ethics, 116, 498–524. CrossRef
- Williams, B. (1973). Deciding to believe. In Problems of the self (pp. 136–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- The possibility of pragmatic reasons for belief and the wrong kind of reasons problem
Volume 145, Issue 2 , pp 257-272
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Wrong kind of reasons
- Reasons for belief
- Theoretical reason
- Andrew Reisner (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, McGill University, Leacock Building, 855, rue Sherbrooke Ouest, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3A 2T7