Philosophical Studies

, Volume 138, Issue 3, pp 317–333

Avoiding certain frustration, reflection, and the cable guy paradox

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11098-006-9044-1

Cite this article as:
Kierland, B., Monton, B. & Ruhmkorff, S. Philos Stud (2008) 138: 317. doi:10.1007/s11098-006-9044-1

Abstract

We discuss the cable guy paradox, both as an object of interest in its own right and as something which can be used to illuminate certain issues in the theories of rational choice and belief. We argue that a crucial principle—The Avoid Certain Frustration (ACF) principle—which is used in stating the paradox is false, thus resolving the paradox. We also explain how the paradox gives us new insight into issues related to the Reflection principle. Our general thesis is that principles that base your current opinions on your current opinions about your future opinions need not make reference to the particular times in the future at which you believe you will have those opinions, but they do need to make reference to the particular degrees of belief you believe you will have in the future.

Keywords

BayesianismReflection principleStopping times

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian Kierland
    • 1
  • Bradley Monton
    • 2
  • Samuel Ruhmkorff
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA
  3. 3.Division of Social StudiesSimon’s Rock College of BardGreat BarringtonUSA