Three questions about Leplin’s reliabilism
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Christensen, D. Philos Stud (2007) 134: 43. doi:10.1007/s11098-006-9019-2
Jarrett Leplin’s paper is multifaceted; it’s rich with ideas, and I won’t even try to touch on all of them. Instead, I’d like to raise three questions about the paper: one about its definition of reliable method, one about its solution to the generality problem, and one about its answer to clairvoyance-type objections.