Philosophical Studies

, Volume 127, Issue 3, pp 351–382

On the Importance of History for Responsible Agency


DOI: 10.1007/s11098-004-7819-9

Cite this article as:
Vargas, M. Philos Stud (2006) 127: 351. doi:10.1007/s11098-004-7819-9


In this article I propose a resolution to the history issue for responsible agency, given a moderate revisionist approach to responsibility. Roughly, moderate revisionism is the view that a plausible and normatively adequate theory of responsibility will require principled departures from commonsense thinking. The history issue is whether morally responsible agency – that is, whether an agent is an apt target of our responsibility-characteristic practices and attitudes – is an essentially historical notion. Some have maintained that responsible agents must have particular sorts of histories, others have argued that no such history is required. Resolution of this contentious issue is connected to a wide range of concerns, including the significance and culpability of different forms of manipulation, the plausibility of important incompatibilist criticisms of compatibilism, and of course, a satisfactory account of moral responsibility. As it turns out, history matters sometimes, but less frequently than we might think.

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of San FranciscoSan Francisco

Personalised recommendations