The holy grail of cognitivism: a response to Adams and Aizawa
- Richard Menary
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Adams and Aizawa (2010b) define cognitivism as the processing of representations with underived content. In this paper, I respond to their use of this stipulative definition of cognition. I look at the plausibility of Adams and Aizawa’s cognitivism, taking into account that they have no criteria for cognitive representation and no naturalistic theory of content determination. This is a glaring hole in their cognitivism—which requires both a theory of representation and underived content to be successful. I also explain why my own position, cognitive integration, is not susceptible to the supposed causal-coupling fallacy. Finally, I look at the more interesting question of whether the distinction between derived and underived content is important for cognition. Given Adams and Aizawa’s concession that there is no difference in content between derived and underived representations (only a difference in how they get their content) I conclude that the distinction is not important and show that there is empirical research which does not respect the distinction.
- Adams, A., & Aizawa, K. (2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14, 43–64. CrossRef
- Adams, A., & Aizawa, K. (2008). Defending the bounds of cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Adams A. and Aizawa K. (2010a) Defending the bounds of cognition, In: Menary, R. (ed.) The Extended Mind Bradford Books/MIT Press.
- Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2010b). The value of cognitivism in thinking about extended cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. doi:10.1007/s11097-010-9184-9
- Beer, R. (1995). Computational and dynamical languages for autonomous agents. In R. Port & T. Van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Dynamics, behavior, and cognition. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
- Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Clark A. (2010) Memento’s revenge, In: Menary, R. (ed.) The Extended Mind Bradford Books/MIT Press.
- Dehaene, S. (2007). A few steps towards a science of mental life. Mind, Brain and Education, 1(1), 28–47. CrossRef
- Fodor, J. (1998). Do we think in mentalese: Remarks on some arguments of peter carruthers. In J. Fodor (Ed.), Critical condition: Polemical essays on cognitive science and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Hurley S. (2010) Varieties of externalism, In: Menary, R. (ed.) The Extended Mind Bradford Books/MIT Press.
- Hutto, D. (2008). Folk psychological narratives: The sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
- Menary, R. (2006). Attacking the bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 19(3), 329–344. CrossRef
- Menary, R. (2007). Cognitive integration: Mind and cognition unbounded. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Menary, R. (2009). Intentionality cognitive integration and the continuity thesis. Topoi, 28, 31–43. CrossRef
- Menary, R. (2010). Cognitive integration and the extended mind. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind. Camb Mass: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
- Millikan, R. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories. Camb Mass: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
- Port, R., & Van Gelder, T. (Eds.). (1995). Mind as motion: Dynamics, behavior, and cognition. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
- Ramsey, W. (2008). Representation reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ross D. and Ladyman J. (2010) The alleged coupling-constitution fallacy and the mature sciences in Menary, R. (ed.) The Extended Mind, Camb Mass.: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
- Rowlands, M. (1999). The body in mind: Understanding cognitive processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Searle, J. (1980). Minds, brains and programs. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417–457. CrossRef
- Spivey, M. (2007). Continuity in mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Sterelny, K. (2010). Minds: Extended or scaffolded? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. doi:10.1007/s11097-010-9174-y
- Stotz, K. (2010). Human nature and cognitive–developmental niche construction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. doi:10.1007/s11097-010-9178-7
- Sutton, J., Harris, C. B., Keil, P. G., Barnier, A. J. (2010). The psychology of memory, extended cognition, and socially distributed remembering. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. doi:10.1007/s11097-010-9182-y
- Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1996). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Camb Mass: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
- The holy grail of cognitivism: a response to Adams and Aizawa
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
Volume 9, Issue 4 , pp 605-618
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Cognitive integration
- Extended mind
- Distributed cognition
- Richard Menary (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, The University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia