Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 465–481

Minds: extended or scaffolded?

Authors

    • Philosophy and Tempo and ModeAustralian National University
    • PhilosophyVictoria University of Wellington
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11097-010-9174-y

Cite this article as:
Sterelny, K. Phenom Cogn Sci (2010) 9: 465. doi:10.1007/s11097-010-9174-y

Abstract

This paper discusses two perspectives, each of which recognises the importance of environmental resources in enhancing and amplifying our cognitive capacity. One is the Clark–Chalmers model, extended further by Clark and others. The other derives from niche construction models of evolution, models which emphasise the role of active agency in enhancing the adaptive fit between agent and world. In the human case, much niche construction is epistemic: making cognitive tools and assembling other informational resources that support and scaffold intelligent action. I shall argue that extended mind cases are limiting cases of environmental scaffolding, and while the extended mind picture is not false, the niche construction model is a more helpful framework for understanding human action.

Keywords

Extended mind Externalism Niche construction Social learning

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010