Scottish pharmacists’ views and attitudes towards continuing professional development
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Objectives To summarise Scottish pharmacists’ views and attitudes towards Continuing Professional Development (CPD). Setting Random sample of RPSGB registered Scottish pharmacists. Method A postal questionnaire of pharmacists’ CPD activity, views and attitudes was developed, piloted and sent to 2420 pharmacists. Questions were collated to produce total scores and to rate pharmacists’ motivation and attitudes to CPD separately. The number of CPD hours reported by sector and gender were compared (‘t’ test) and differences identified between hospital, community and primary care in relation to mean motivational attitudinal scores (Mann-Whitney test). Results Five hundred and forty three pharmacists completed the questionnaire (22.4% response rate). In this study 9.8% of the pharmacists reported spending no time on CPD. Comparisons of hours showed primary care pharmacists and hospital pharmacists reported similar times spent on CPD and significantly more time than community pharmacists (68 h and 66 h vs 45 h; P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences between genders were revealed. Internal reliability on motivation and attitude scores ranged from 0.74–0.83 (Cronbach’s alpha). Although scores were similar across sectors of practice in terms of motivation and attitudinal questions, statistical differences were consistent; showing higher scores for separate motivation and attitude among pharmacists in primary care than in hospital or community practice sectors (Mann Whitney test; P < 0.001). Community pharmacists had a statistically significantly lower attitude score than pharmacists in hospital or primary care sectors (Mann Whitney test; P < 0.001). Conclusion There is a section of pharmacists still not participating in CPD. Primary care pharmacists reported most motivation and scored highest in attitude score. Community pharmacists appear to be the sector requiring most support to increase not only their motivation to CPD but also their confidence and ability in participation.
- Achieving excellence in pharmacy through clinical governance. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain’s policy on clinical governance. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. Sept 1999.
- Continuing Professional Development: Quality in the new NHS. Department of Health. July 1999.
- Learning from Bristol: the report of the public enquiry into children’s heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995. The Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry. Summary. July 2001.
- A first class service: Quality in the new NHS. Department of Health.
- Continuing Professional Development. Quality in the new NHS. Department of Health.
- Pharmacy in the Future: Implementing the NHS Plan. Department of Health.
- Kolb, DA. Experiential Learning, New Jersey: 1984. Prentice Hall (0 13 295261 0).
- Bell HM, Maguire TA, Adair CG, McGartland LF. Perceptions of CPD within the pharmacy profession. IJPP 2001;9(suppl):R55.
- Mottram DR, Rowe P, Gangani N Al-Khamis Y. Pharmacists’ engagement in continuing education and attitudes towards continuing professional development. Pharm J 2002;268:618–22.
- Attewell J, Blenkinsopp A, Black P. Community pharmacists and continuing professional development-a qualitative study of perceptions and current involvement. Pharm J 2005;274:519–23.
- Swainson D, Silcock J. Continuing professional development for employee pharmacists: a survey to compare practice in the hospital and community sectors. Pharm J 2004;272:290–3.
- Hull H, Hunt A, Rutter P. Community pharmacists’ attitudes and approaches to the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain continuing professional development initiatives. IJPP 2003;11:R50.
- Bollington L. Development of a CPD peer support strategy for hospital pharmacists. Hospital Pharma 2003;10(11):491–4.
- Tracey J, Arroll B, Barham P, Richmond D. The validity of general practitioners’ self-assessment of knowledge: cross section study. BMJ 1997;315:1426–8.
- Furze G, Pearcey P. Continuing education in nursing: a review of the literature. J adv nursing 1999;29(2):355–63. CrossRef
- Swallow V, Clarke C, Iles S, Harden J. Work based, lifelong learning through professional portfolios: Challenge or reward? Pharm Edu 2006;6:77–89. CrossRef
- Royal Pharmaceutical Society consultation document. Mandatory CPD. Available at www.rpsgb.org.uk.
- Attewell JM, Blenkinsopp A, Black P. Community pharmacists and continuing professional development: a study of perceptions and current involvement. IJPP 2002;10(suppl):R9.
- Rouse MJ. Continuing Professional Development in Pharmacy. JAPhA 2004;44:517–20.
- Dean B, Jacklin A, Mounsey A, Newton S. CPD implementation in a large NHS trust. Hospital Pharmacist 2001;8:105–8.
- RPSGB database 2006. Accessed 27.11.06.
- Hassell K, Seston L. Workforce update-joiners, leavers and practising and non-practising pharmacists on the 2006 Register. Pharma J 2006;277:576–8.
- Hassell K. Full-time workers make up less than half the register. Pharma J 2004;273:625–6.
- Smith F. Research Methods in Pharmacy Practice, London: 2002. Pharmaceutical Press: 25. (0 85369 481 8)
- Scottish pharmacists’ views and attitudes towards continuing professional development
Pharmacy World & Science
Volume 30, Issue 1 , pp 136-143
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Community pharmacists
- Continuing professional development
- Hospital pharmacists
- Pharmacist’s attitude
- Pharmacist’s views
- Primary care
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. NHS Education for Scotland, 2 Central Quay, 89 Hydepark St., Glasgow, G3 8BW, Scotland
- 2. University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland
- 3. The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland