Oxidation of Metals

, Volume 74, Issue 5, pp 319–340

Effect of Alloy Composition and Exposure Conditions on the Selective Oxidation Behavior of Ferritic Fe–Cr and Fe–Cr–X Alloys

  • Gerald H. Meier
  • Keeyoung Jung
  • Nan Mu
  • Nazik M. Yanar
  • Frederick S. Pettit
  • J. Pirón Abellán
  • Tomasz Olszewski
  • L. Nieto Hierro
  • Willem J. Quadakkers
  • Gordon R. Holcomb
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s11085-010-9215-5

Cite this article as:
Meier, G.H., Jung, K., Mu, N. et al. Oxid Met (2010) 74: 319. doi:10.1007/s11085-010-9215-5

Abstract

Selective oxidation behavior of ferritic martensitic Fe–Cr base alloys, exposed in various atmospheres containing combinations of O2, CO2, and H2O, were studied at various temperatures relevant to oxy-fuel combustion. This paper begins with a discussion of the required Cr content to form a continuous external chromia scale on a simple binary Fe–Cr alloy exposed in oxygen or air based on experiments and calculations using the classic Wagner model. Then, the effects of the exposure environment and Cr content on the selective oxidation of Fe–Cr alloys are evaluated. Finally, the effects produced by alloying additions of Si, commonly present in various groups of commercially available ferritic steels, are described. The discussion compares the oxide scale formation on simple binary and ternary Fe–Cr base model alloys with that on several commercially available ferritic steels.

Keywords

Oxy-fuel combustion Fe–Cr alloys Ferritic steels Chromia Water vapor Hydrogen Carbon dioxide 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald H. Meier
    • 1
    • 2
  • Keeyoung Jung
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nan Mu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nazik M. Yanar
    • 1
    • 2
  • Frederick S. Pettit
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Pirón Abellán
    • 3
  • Tomasz Olszewski
    • 4
  • L. Nieto Hierro
    • 4
  • Willem J. Quadakkers
    • 4
  • Gordon R. Holcomb
    • 5
  1. 1.National Energy Technology LaboratoryPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Salzgittermannesmann Forschung GmbHDuisburgGermany
  4. 4.Forschungszentrum Jülich, IEF-2JülichGermany
  5. 5.National Energy Technology LaboratoryAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations