Journal of Nanoparticle Research

, 15:1421

What’s in a name? How we define nanotech shapes public reactions

Authors

    • Center for Climate Change CommunicationGeorge Mason University
    • Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center in Templated Synthesis and Assembly at the NanoscaleUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Jiyoun Kim
    • Department of Life Sciences CommunicationUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
    • Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center in Templated Synthesis and Assembly at the NanoscaleUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Dietram A. Scheufele
    • Department of Life Sciences CommunicationUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
    • Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University
    • Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center in Templated Synthesis and Assembly at the NanoscaleUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Dominique Brossard
    • Department of Life Sciences CommunicationUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
    • Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University
    • Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center in Templated Synthesis and Assembly at the NanoscaleUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Michael A. Xenos
    • Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center in Templated Synthesis and Assembly at the NanoscaleUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
    • Department of Communication ArtsUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
Perspectives

DOI: 10.1007/s11051-013-1421-z

Cite this article as:
Anderson, A.A., Kim, J., Scheufele, D.A. et al. J Nanopart Res (2013) 15: 1421. doi:10.1007/s11051-013-1421-z

Abstract

Audiences are most likely to form their opinions about issues based on the aspects that are primed and easily available in their minds (Hastie and Park, Psychol Rev 93:258–268, 1986; Tversky and Kahneman, Cogn Psychol 5:207–232, 1973). In this study, we examine how priming people with various definitions of nanotechnology differently shapes public perceptions of and engagement with the technology. Using a randomized experimental design embedded in a representative survey of the U.S. population (n = 1,736), we find that defining nanotechnology in terms of novel applications increases public support for nanotechnology but does not motivate audiences to gather more information about it. In contrast, definitions highlighting the potential risks and benefits of nanotechnology can increase likelihood of future information seeking.

Keywords

Public opinion Public engagement Nanotechnology Definition

Supplementary material

11051_2013_1421_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013