“You make me sick”: Moral dyspepsia as a reaction to third-party sibling incest
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
A pilot study and two main studies lent support to the hypothesis that appraisals of consensual sibling incest as immoral may directly engender the phenomenological state of oral inhibition (OI), comprised of nausea, gagging, and diminished appetite. More specifically, the findings indicate that (a) OI is a central component of a third-party reaction to sibling incest (significantly more so than anger or fear), (b) that it is produced specifically by the morally proscribed aspect of the incestuous relationship (sex between two individuals with common ancestry), and that (c) it is produced so directly rather than as a by-product of a more immediate emotional response (say, intense anger or fear). Furthermore, Study 2 found equal levels of OI for individuals with and without opposite-sex siblings, indicating that third-party aversion to consensual incest is, most likely, a function of the culturally transmitted information regarding the inherent wrongness of such acts.
- Angyal, A. (1941). Disgust and related aversions. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 36, 393–412. CrossRef
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. CrossRef
- Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
- Darwin C. R. (1965). The expression of emotions in man and animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (Original work published in 1872).
- Ehrlich, E., Flexner, S. B., Carruth, G., & Hawkins, J. M. (1980). Oxford American dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D. (2004). Why rejection hurts: A common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trend in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 294–300. CrossRef
- Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. New York: Times Books.
- Fessler, D. M. T., & Navarrete, C. D. (2004). Third-party attitudes toward sibling incest: Evidence for Westermarck’s hypotheses. Evolution & Human Behavior, 25, 277–294.
- Gould, S. J. (1991). Exaptation: A crucial tool for an evolutionary psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 43–65. CrossRef
- Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8, 4–15.
- Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834. CrossRef
- Haidt, J., Rozin, P., McCauley, C. R., & Imada, S. (1997). Body, psyche and culture: The relationship between disgust and morality. Psychology and Developing Societies, 9, 107–131. CrossRef
- Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum Press.
- Levi-Strauss, C. (1969). The Elementary structures of Kinship. Boston: Beacon.
- Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2003). Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 270, 819–826. CrossRef
- MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 202–223. CrossRef
- Miller, W. I. (1997). The anatomy of disgust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Muth, E. R., Stern, R. M., & Koch, K. L. (1998). A psychophysiological paradigm for the study of nausea. Journal of Psychophysiology, 12, 56–63.
- Muth, E. R., Stern, R. M., Thayer, J. F., & Koch, K. L. (1996). Assessment of the multiple dimensions of nausea: The Nausea Profile (NP). Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 40, 511–520. CrossRef
- Nabi, R. (2002). The theoretical versus the lay meaning of disgust: Implications for emotion research. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 695–703. CrossRef
- Royzman, E. B., & Sabini, J. (2001). Something it takes to be an emotion: The interesting case of disgust. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31, 29–60. CrossRef
- Rozin, P., & Fallon, A. E. (1987). A perspective on disgust. Psychological Review, 94, 23–41. CrossRef
- Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574–586. CrossRef
- Russell, J. A., & Fehr, B. (1994). Fuzzy concepts in a fuzzy hierarchy: Varieties of anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 186–205. CrossRef
- Shand, A. F. (1920). The foundations of character (2nd ed.). London: McMillan.
- Shepher, J. (1983). Incest, a biosocial view. New York: Academic Press. Cambridge University Press.
- Simpson, J., Carter, S., Anthony, S. H., & Overton, P.G. (2006). Is disgust a homogenous emotion? Motivation and Emotion, 30, 31–41. CrossRef
- Vrana, S. R. (1993). The psychophysiology of disgust: Differentiating negative emotional contexts with facial EMG. Psychophysiology, 30, 279–286. CrossRef
- Westermarck, E. (1921). The history of human marriage (5th ed.). London: McMillan.
- Wolf, A. P. (1995). Sexual attraction and childhood association: A Chinese brief for Edward Westermarck. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- “You make me sick”: Moral dyspepsia as a reaction to third-party sibling incest
Motivation and Emotion
Volume 32, Issue 2 , pp 100-108
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors