Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Coastal and riverine ecosystems as adaptive flood defenses under a changing climate

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adaptation planning for flood risk forms a significant part of global climate change response. Engineering responses to higher water levels can be prohibitively costly. Several recent studies emphasize the potential role of ecosystems in flood protection as adaptive risk reduction measures while also contributing to carbon fixation. Here, we use a conceptual model study to illustrate the built-in adaptive capability of ecosystems to reduce a wide range of wave heights, occurring at different water levels, to a narrower range. Our model shows that wave height of waves running through a forested section is independent of initial height or of water level. Although the underlying phenomenon of non-linear wave attenuation within coastal vegetation is well studied, implications of reducing variability in wave heights for design of ecosystem and levee combinations have not yet been properly outlined. Narrowing the range of wave heights by a vegetation field generates an adaptive levee that is robust to a whole range of external conditions rather than only to a maximum wave height. This feature can substantially reduce costs for retrofitting of levees under changing future wave climates. Thereby, in wave prone areas, inclusion of ecosystems into flood defense schemes constitutes an adaptive and safe alternative to only hard engineered flood risk measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bao TQ (2011) Effect of mangrove forest structures on wave attenuation in coastal Vietnam. Oceanologia 53(3):807–8018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB, Koch EW, Silliman BR et al (2008) Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values. Science 319(5861):321–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booij N, Ris RC, Holthuijsen LH (1999) A third-generation wave model for coastal regions: 1. Model description and validation. J Geophys Res 104(C4):7649–7666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsje BW, van Wesenbeeck BK, Dekker F et al (2011) How ecological engineering can serve in coastal protection. Ecol Eng 37:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong S-M, Silliman B, Wong PP et al (2013) Coastal adaptation with ecological engineering. Nat Clim Chang 3(9):787–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIRIA, Ecology, M. o. and USACE (2013) The International Levee Handbook (C731), CIRIA

  • Cochard R, Ranamukhaarachchi SL, Shivakoti GP et al (2008) The 2004 tsunami in Aceh and Southern Thailand: a review on coastal ecosystems, wave hazards and vulnerability. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 10(1):3–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple RA, Kirby JT, Hwang PA (1984) Wave diffraction due to areas of energy dissipation. J Waterw Port Coast Eng 110(1):67–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denny MW (1988) Biology and the mechanics of the wave-swept environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 329

  • Duarte CM, Losada IJ, Hendriks IE et al (2013) The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 3(11):961–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedan KB, Kirwan ML, Wolanski E et al (2011) The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: answering recent challenges to the paradigm. Clim Change 106(1):7–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte S, Green C, Nicholls RJ et al (2013) Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nat Clim Chang 3(9):802–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes SA (2008) Estimation of combined wave and storm surge overtopping at earthen levees. Coastal and Hydraulics Engineering Technical Note ERDC/CHL CHETN-III-78. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center

  • Jonkman SN, Hillen MM, Nicholls RJ et al (2013) Costs of adapting coastal defences to sea-level rise—new estimates and their implications. J Coast Res 29:1212–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan ML, Megonigal JP (2013) Tidal wetland stability in the face of human impacts and sea-level rise. Nature 504(7478):53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch EW, Barbier EB, Silliman BR et al (2009) Non-linearity in ecosystem services: temporal and spatial variability in coastal protection. Front Ecol Environ 7(1):29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock CE, Cahoon DR, Friess DA et al (2015) The vulnerability of Indo-Pacific mangrove forests to sea-level rise. Nature 526(7574):559–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massel SR, Furukawa K, Brinkman RM (1999) Surface wave propagation in mangrove forests. Fluid Dyn Res 24(4):219–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazda Y, Magi M, Ikeda Y et al (2006) Wave reduction in a mangrove forest dominated by Sonneratia sp. Wetl Ecol Manag 14(4):365–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIvor A, Möller I, Spencer T, Spalding M (2012) Reduction of wind and swell waves by mangroves. Natural coastal protection series: Report 1. Cambridge coastal research unit working paper 40. The nature conservancy, Arlington, USA/Wetlands International, Wageningen, Netherlands, pp 27

  • McIvor A, Spencer T, Möller I, and Spalding M (2012) Storm surge reduction by mangroves. Natural coastal protection series: Report 2. Cambridge coastal research unit working paper 41. The Nature Conservancy and Wetlands International, pp 35. http://www.naturalcoastalprotection.org/documents/storm-surge-reduction-by-mangroves

  • McIvor A, Spencer T, Möller I, and M. Spalding (2013) The response of mangrove soil surface elevation to sea level rise. Natural Coastal Protection Series: Report 3, Cambridge Coastal Research Unit Working Paper 42. Published by The Nature Conservancy and Wetlands International, pp 59

  • McKee KL (2011) Biophysical controls on accretion and elevation change in Caribbean mangrove ecosystems. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 91(4):475–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendez FJ, Losada IJ (2004) An empirical model to estimate the propagation of random breaking and nonbreaking waves over vegetation fields. Coast Eng 51(2):103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller I, Kudella M, Rupprecht F et al (2014) Wave attenuation over coastal salt marshes under storm surge conditions. Nat Geosci 7(10):727–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller I, Mantilla-Contreras J, Spencer T et al (2011) Micro-tidal coastal reed beds: hydro-morphological insights and observations on wave transformation from the southern Baltic Sea. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 92(3):424–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller I, Spencer T (2002) Wave dissipation over macro-tidal saltmarshes: effects of marsh edge typology and vegetation change. J Coast Res 36:506–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris JT, Sundareshwar PV, Nietch CT et al (2002) Responses of coastal wetlands to rising sea level. Ecology 83(10):2869–2877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Fetherston KL, McKay SJ et al (1998) In: Naiman RJ, Bilby R (eds) Riparian forests. River ecology and management: Llssons from the Pacific Coastal ecoregion. Springer, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ranger N, Reeder T, Lowe J (2013) Addressing ‘deep’ uncertainty over long-term climate in major infrastructure projects: four innovations of the Thames Estuary 2100 Project. EURO J Decis Process 1(3-4):233–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid H, Swiderska K (2008) “Biodiversity, climate change and poverty: exploring the links. International Institute for Environment and Development.”

  • Shepard CC, Crain CM, Beck MW (2011) The protective role of coastal marshes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos One 6(11):e27374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding MD, McIvor AL, Beck MW et al (2014) Coastal ecosystems: a critical element of risk reduction. Conserv Lett 7(3):293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki T, Zijlema M, Burger B et al (2012) Wave dissipation by vegetation with layer schematization in SWAN. Coast Eng 59(1):64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wesenbeeck BK, Mulder JPM, Marchand M et al (2014) Damming deltas: a practice of the past? Towards nature-based flood defenses. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 140:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterwerp JC, Erftemeijer PLA, Suryadiputra N et al (2013) Defining eco-morphodynamic requirements for rehabilitating eroding mangrove-mud coasts. Wetlands 33(3):515–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors like to thank Jaap Kwadijk and Marc Bierkens and the anonymous reviewers for their comments on previous versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bregje K. van Wesenbeeck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Wesenbeeck, B.K., de Boer, W., Narayan, S. et al. Coastal and riverine ecosystems as adaptive flood defenses under a changing climate. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 22, 1087–1094 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-016-9714-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-016-9714-z

Keywords

Navigation