Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biogas in the United States: estimating future production and learning from international experiences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The substitution of biogas, an energy source derived from biological feedstock, for fossil natural gas (NG) can mitigate the build-up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, making it an attractive renewable energy source in a carbon-constrained future. Although upgraded, pipeline-quality biogas can augment the NG market supply in the United States of America (USA), researchers and energy industry experts have little studied its long-term potential. This report estimates (1) levelized costs of energy for biogas production facilities operating with landfill waste, animal manure, wastewater sludge, and biomass residue feedstocks, (2) feedstock and technology pathway-specific biogas supply functions, and (3) the aggregate national biogas supply potential for the USA by 2040. Under a range of specified assumptions, generation of biogas could be expanded to approximately 3–5 % of the total domestic NG market at projected prices of $5–6/MMBtu, with the largest potential source coming from thermal gasification of agriculture and forest residues and biomass. As market signals have not spurred widespread adoption of biogas in the USA, policy incentives, similar to those used in the European Union (E.U.), may be necessary to increase its production and use. Bioenergy policy in the E.U. and the resulting market penetration achieved there therefore provides important lessons for how biogas markets in the USA can overcome barriers to market expansion and, in doing so, provide substantial climate mitigation benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AEBIOM (European Biomass Association) (2009) A biogas roadmap for Europe, www.aebiom.org/IMG/pdf/Brochure_BiogasRoadmap_WEB.pdf

  • American Biogas Council (2014) Current and potential biogas production, https://www.americanbiogascouncil.org/pdf/biogas101.pdf

  • Bain RL, Amos WA, Downing M, Perlack RL (2003) Biopower technical assessment: state of the industry and technology. NREL Technical report: NREL/TP-510-33123. 277p

  • BMU (German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety/ Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit) (2012) http://www.ernerbare-energien.de/en/unser-service/mediathek/downloads/detailview/artikel/renewable-energy-sources-act-eeg-2012/. Last accessed 9/30/2014

  • Chang I, Wu J, Zhou C, Shi M, Yang Y (2014) A time-geographical approach to biogas potential analysis of China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 37:318–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chum H, Faaij A, Moreira J, Berndes G, Dhamija P, Dong H, Gabrielle B, Goss Eng A, Lucht W, Mapako M, Masera Cerutti O, McIntyre T, Minowa T, Pingoud K (2011) Bioenergy. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Matschoss P, Kadner S, Zwickel T, Eickemeier P, Hansen G, Schlömer S, von Stechow C (eds) IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chynoweth DP, Owens JM, Legrand R (2001) Renewable methane from anaerobic digestion of biomass. Renew Energy 22:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley D, Murray BC, Ross M, Lee M-Y, Yeh K (2013) An economic examination of North Carolina landfill biogas development potential. Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University, Durham, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA-AgStar (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, AgStar Program) (2011) Recovering value from waste: anaerobic digester system basics. Available at http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-12/documents/recovering_value_from_waste.pdf, last accessed July 29, 2015

  • EPA-AgStar (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, AgStar Program) (2013) Available at http://www.epa.gov/agstar/projects/index.html#database, last accessed September 29, 2013

  • EPA-LMOP (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Landfill Methane Outreach Program) (2013) Available at http://www.epa.gov/lmop, last accessed June 18, 2013

  • EurObserv’ER (2014) Biogas Barometer. Available at http://www.energies-renouvelables.org/observ-er/stat_baro/observ/baro224_Biogas_en.pdf, last accessed June 10th, 2015

  • European Commission (2012) The E.U. climate and energy package, http://ec.ropa.eu/clima/policies/package/index_en.htm

  • FAO (The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2012) Good environmental practices in bioenergy feedstock production: making bioenergy work for climate and food security. In: Rossi A (ed) Environment and natural resources working paper No.49. FAO, Rome, 235 p

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2014) In: Romano F, Rossi A (eds) Tenure related issues in bioenergy development: short guidance. FAO, Rome, 12 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassner M, Marechal F (2009) Thermo-economic process model for thermochemical production of synthetic NG (SNG) from lignocellulosic biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 33(11):1587–1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray D, Challman D, Geertsema A, Drake D, Andrews R (2007) Technologies for producing transportation fuels, chemicals, synthetic NG and electricity from the gasification of Kentucky coal. Challman D (ed) A Report in Response to House Bill 299, Sections 3 (1), (2) and (6). University of Kentucky, Center for Applied Energy Research. 77 p

  • Gunaseelan VN (1997) Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: a review. Biomass Bioenergy 13:83–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm-Nielsen JB, Seadi TA, Oleskowicz-Popiel P (2009) The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour Technol 100:5478–5484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICF (ICF International) (2013) Greenhouse gas mitigation options and costs for agricultural land and animal production within the United States. Washington, D.C

  • IEA (International Energy Agency) (2009) Energy sector methane recovery and use: the importance of policy. Paris, France. 46 p

  • Igliński B, Buczkowski R, Cichosz M (2015) Biogas production in Poland—current state, potential and perspectives. Renew Sust Energ Rev 50:686–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (intergovernmental panel on climate change) (2012) In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Matschoss P, Kadner S, Zwickel T, Eickemeier P, Hansen G, Schlömer S, von Stechow C (eds) Special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkels AF, Verbong GPJ (2011) Biomass gasification: still promising? A 30-year global overview. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:471–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krich K, Augenstein D, Batmale JP, Benemann J, Rutledge B, Salour D (2005) Biomethane from dairy waste: a sourcebook for the production and use of renewable NG in California. A report prepared for Western United dairymen

  • Labatut RA, Angenent LT, Scott NR (2011) Biochemical potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates. Bioresour Technol 102:2255–2264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milbrandt A (2005) A geographic perspective on the current biomass resource availability in the United States. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report NREL/TP-560-39181, Golden, CO

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service) (2013) Farms, land in farms, and livestock operations: 2012 summary. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • NPC (National Petroleum Council) (2013) Renewable natural gas for transportation: an overview of the feedstock capacity, economics, and GHG emission reduction benefits of RNG as a low-carbon fuel, p 41. Available at www.npc.org/FTF_Topic_papers/22-RNG.pdf. Accessed 3 Sept 2015

  • PG&E (Pacific Gas and Electric Company) (2013) Transmission tariff data available at http://www.pge.com/tariffs/GRF.SHTML#GNT, last accessed September 29, 2013

  • PNG (Piedmont Natural Gas) (2013) Transmission tariff data available at http://www.piedmontng.com/files/pdfs/rates/nc_rates_2013-08.pdf, last accessed September 29, 2013

  • Prasodjo D, Vujic T, Cooley D, Yeh K, Lee M-Y (2013) A spatial-economic optimization study of swine waste-derived biogas infrastructure design in North Carolina. Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions and Duke Carbon Offsets Initiative. Duke University, Durham, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryckebosch E, Drouillon M, Vervaeren H (2011) Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane. Biomass Bioenergy 35:1633–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Themelis NJ, Ulloa PA (2007) Methane generation in landfills. Renew Energy 32:1243–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thran D, Seiffert M, Muller-Langer F, Plattner A, Vogel A (2007) Possible European biogas supply strategies, http://www.hans-josef-fell.de/content/index.php/dokumente-mainmenu-77/doc_download/213-study-possible-european-biogas-supply-strategies

  • USCB (U.S. Census Bureau) (2012) Available at http://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2012/summarytables.html, last accessed September 20, 2013

  • USDA, USEPA, USDOE (U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Energy) (2014) Biogas opportunities roadmap: voluntary actions to reduce methane emissions and increase energy independence. Available at http://www.usda.gov/oce/reports/energy/Biogas_Opportunities_Roadmap_8-1-14.pdf. Accessed 3 Sept 2015

  • USDOE (U.S. Department of Energy) (2011) U.S. billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. R.D. Perlack and B.J. Stokes (Leads), ORNL/TM-2011/224. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. 227p

  • USEIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration) (2013a) Annual energy outlook 2013 with projections to 2040. DOE/EIA-0383(2013). Office of Integrated and International Energy Analysis, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • USEIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration) (2013b) Monthly energy review: energy consumption by sector. Available at www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/. Accessed 3 Sept 2015

  • USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2008) Catalog of CHP technologies. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Combined Heat and Power Partnership, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2011a) Market opportunities for biogas recovery systems at U.S. livestock facilities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, AgStar Program, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2011b) Opportunities for combined heat and power at wastewater treatment facilities: market analysis and lessons from the field. Prepared by Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG) and Resource Dynamics Corporation (RDC) for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Combined Heat and Power Partnership, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2013) Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2011. EPA 430-R-13-001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Change Division, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • van Foreest F (2012) Perspectives for Biogas in Europe. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, http://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/NG-70.pdf

  • Walsh ME, (2008) U.S. cellulosic biomass feedstock supplies and distribution. M&E Biomass

  • Weiland P (2010) Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:849–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwart RWR, Boerrigter H, Deurwaarder EP, van der Meijden CM, van Paasen SVB (2006) Production of synthetic NG (SNG) from biomass: development and operation of an integrated bio-SNG system. ECN-E--06-018. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands. 62 p

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported financially in part by a sponsored research agreement with Shell, Inc., but all opinions stated herein are those of the authors from Duke University. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Marc Deshusses of Duke’s Pratt School of Engineering and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and Melissa Edeburn for editing and formatting assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tibor Vegh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murray, B.C., Galik, C.S. & Vegh, T. Biogas in the United States: estimating future production and learning from international experiences. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 22, 485–501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9683-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9683-7

Keywords

Navigation