Application of the ‘Climafor’ Approach to Estimate Baseline Carbon Emissions of a Forest Conservation Project in the Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, Mexico
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
We present a methodology for testing and applying a regional baseline for carbon (C) emissions from land-use change, using a spatial modelling approach (hereafter called the Climafor approach). The methodology is based on an analysis of causal factors of previous land-use change (Castillo et al. 2005). Carbon risk matrices constructed from the spatial correlation analysis between observed deforestation and driving factors (Castillo et al. 2005), are used to estimate future carbonemissions within acceptable limits for a forest conservation project. The performance of two risk matrices were tested by estimating carbon emissions between 1975 and 1996 from randomly selected sample plots of sizes varying from 1,600 to 10,000 ha and comparing the results of the observed emissions from these sample plots with the model estimations. Expected emissions from continued land-use change was estimated for the community applying the risk matrices to the current land cover. The methodology provides an objective means of constructing baseline scenarios including confidence intervals, using the sum of variances of the various data sources, such as measured carbon densities, classification errors, errors in the risk matrices, and differences between the model prediction and observed emissions of sample plots due to sample size. The procedures applied in this study also give an indication of the impact of the variance in the various data sources on the size of the confidence intervals, which allows project developers to decide what data sources are essential to improve his baseline. The modelling approach to estimate the deforestation pattern is based on readily available cartographic and census data, whereas data on carbon densities are required to assess the potential for forest conservation projects to offset carbon emissions.
- Brown, S., Burnham, M., Delaney, M., Powell, M., Vaca, R. and Moreno, A.: 2000, ‘Issues and challenges for forest-based carbon-offset projects: A case study of the Noel Kempff climate action project in Bolivia’, Miti. Adapt. Strat. Global Change 5(1), 99–121. CrossRef
- Castillo, M.A., Hellier, A., Tipper, R. and De Jong, B.H.J.: 2005, ‘Carbon emissions from land-use change: a regional analysis of causal factors in Chiapas, Mexico’, Miti. Adapt. Strat. Global Change, in press.
- Chomitz, K.M. and Gray, D.A.: 1995. ‘Roads, land use, and deforestation, a spatial model applied to belize’, World Bank Econ. Rev. 10(3), 487–512.
- Cropper, M., Puri, J. and Griffiths, C.: 2001, ‘Predicting the location of deforestation’, Land Econ. 77(2), 172–186.
- De Jong, B.H.J., Ochoa-Gaona, S., Castillo-Santiago, M.A., Ramírez-Marcial, N. and Cairns, M.: 2000, ‘Land-use/land-cover change and carbon flux in the Selva Lacandona, Mexico’, Ambio 29(8), 504–511.
- Deininger, K. and Minten, B.: 1996, Determinants of Forest Cover and the Economics of Protection: An Application to Mexico, World Bank, Washington, DC.
- Dutsche, M.: 2000. ‘Host country-driven implementation: The case of Costa Rica’, in A. Michaelowa and M. Dutsche (eds.), Climate Policy and Development: Flexible Instruments and Developing Countries, pp. 133–179. http://home.wtal.de/dutschke/
- Dutsche, M.: 2002, CDM Forestry, Additionality and Baselines, Work in Progress. http://home.wtal.de/dutschke/
- INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geografia y Informatica): 1984, Carta Uso del Suelo y Vegetación 1:250 000. Tuxtla Gutierrez E15-11, INEGI, Mexico, D.F.
- INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geografia y Informatica): 1987, Carta Uso del Suelo y Vegetación 1:250 000. Villahermosa E15-8, INEGI, Mexico, D.F.
- INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geografia y Informatica): 1988, Carta Uso del Suelo y Vegetación 1:250 000. Las Margaritas E15-12, INEGI, Mexico, D.F.
- INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geografia y Informatica): 1991, Sistema para la con-sulta de Información Censal (SCINCE) XI Censo General de Población y Vivienda, INEGI, Aguascalientes, Ags., México.
- Mamingi, N., Chomitz, K.M., Gray, D.A. and Lambin, E.F.: 1996, Spatial Patterns of Deforestation in Cameroon and Zaire, Working Paper 8, Research Project on Social and Environmental Consequences of Growth-Oriented Policies, Policy Research Department, World Bank, Washington, DC.
- Masera, O.R., Ordonez, M.J. and Dirzo, R.: 1997. ‘Carbon emissions from Mexican forests: Current situation and long-term scenarios’, Clim. Change 35, 265–295. CrossRef
- Mertens, B. and Lambin, E.F.: 2000, ‘Land cover-change trajectories in southern Cameroon’, Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geograph. 90(3), 467–494. CrossRef
- Mertens, B., Poccard-Chapuis, R., Piketty,M.-G., Lacques, A.-E. and Venturieri, A.: 2002, ‘Crossing spatial analyses and livestock economics to understand deforestation processes in the Brazilian Amazon: the case of São Félix do Xingú in South Pará’, Agric. Econ. 27, 269–294. CrossRef
- Nelson, G. and Hellerstein, D.: 1997, ‘Do roads cause deforestation? using satellite images in econometric analysis of land use’, Amer. J. Agric. Econ. 79, 80–88.
- Schlamadinger, B. and Marland, G.: 2000, Land Use & Global Climate Change: Forests, Land Management, and the Kyoto Protocol, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 54 pp.
- SGS: 1998, Final Report of the Assessment of Project Design and Schedule of Emission Reduction Units for the Protected Areas Project of the Costa Rican Office for Joint Implementation, SGS, Oxford, 133 pp.
- Stewart, R., Anderson, D., Amin Aslam, M., Eyre, C., Jones, G., Sands, P., Stuart,M. and Yamin, F.: 2000, The Clean Development Mechanism: Building International Public-Private Partnerships Under The Kyoto Protocol, UNCTAD/GDS/GFSB/Misc.7. 101 pp.
- Stuart, M.D. and Moura-Costa, P.: 1998, Climate Change Mitigation by Forestry: A Review of International Initiatives, Policy that works for Forests and People series no.8. International, Institutes for Environment and Development, London.
- Tipper, R. and De Jong, B.H.: 1998, ‘Quantification and regulation of carbon offsets from forestry: comparison of alternative methodologies, with special reference to Chiapas, Mexico’, Commonw. For. Rev. 77(3), 219–227.
- UNFCCC: 2000, Uniform Reporting Format: Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase Costa Rica – Norway Pursuant to Documents, FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1 Decision 5/CP.1, para. 2 (b) June 2000 http://unfccc.int/program/coop/aij/aijact01/crinor01-00.html
- Application of the ‘Climafor’ Approach to Estimate Baseline Carbon Emissions of a Forest Conservation Project in the Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, Mexico
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
Volume 10, Issue 2 , pp 265-278
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- carbon emissions
- forest conservation
- risk matrices
- Industry Sectors