Aikenhead, Glen S. 1996. Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined communities. London: Verso.
BA 2002. Science in society. Advice to the Office of Science and Technology from the BA
2002 [cited 14 May 2010]. Available from http://www.britishscienceassociation.org/web/News/ReportsandPublications/Reports/Key_publications/_SIS_advice_to_OST.htm
Bachelard, Gaston. 2001. The formation of the scientific mind. Manchester: Clinamen Press Ltd.
Badiou, Alain. 2006. Metapolitics. London: Verso.
Balibar, Étienne. 2004. We, the people of Europe? Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Bandelli, Andrea, Elly A. Konijn, and Jaap W. Willems. 2009. The need for public participation in the governance of science centers. Museum Management and Curatorship
Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, Los Angeles & London: University of California Press.
Barnes, Barry, David Bloor, and John Henry. 1996. Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barton, Angela C. 2002. Urban science education: A commitment to equity, justice and a sense of place. Studies in Science Education
Bauer, Martin W., Nick Allum, and Steve Miller. 2007. What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity (trans: Ritter, M.). London: Sage.
Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette. 2001. A genealogy of the increasing gap between science and the public. Public Understanding of Science
Bernstein, Basil. 2000. Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. New York and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
BIS 2010. Science for all: Report and action plan from the science for all expert group (to the Dept for Business Innovation & Skills)
. Available from http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/corporate/docs/s/science-for-all-report.pdf
Bodmer, Walter F. 1986. The public understanding of science. London: Birkbeck College.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2004. Science of science and reflexivity. Cambridge: Polity.
Burchill, Kevin. 2007. UK governmental public dialogue on science and technology, 1998–2007: Consistency, hybridity and boundary work. In Paper presented to STEG group at King’s College London.
Burchill, Kevin, Sarah Franklin, and Kerry Holden. 2009. Public culture and professional science. London: BIOS.
Collins, Harry, and Robert Evans. 2002. The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science
Collins, Harry, and Trevor Pinch. 1998. The golem. What you should know about science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Council of the European Union. 2000. Conclusions of the Lisbon European Council. Council of the European Union SN 100/00: 23–24 Mar 2000.
Cunningham, Christine M., and Jenifer V. Helms. 1998. Sociology of science as a means to a more authentic, inclusive science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
De Greiff, Pablo. 2000. Deliberative democracy and group representation. Social Theory and Practice 26(3): 397–415.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 2004. A thousand plateaus. London: Continuum.
DIUS 2008. A vision for science and society: A consultation on developing a new strategy for the UK
2008 [cited 15 Apr 2010]. Available from http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/scienceandsociety/files/A_Vision_for_Science_and_Society.pdf
Dryzek, John. 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Durodie, Bill. 2003. Limitations of public dialogue in science and the rise of new ‘experts’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
European Commission 2009. Global governance of science: Report of the expert group on global governance of science to the EU Science, Economy and Society Directorate
[cited 22 July 2009]. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/global-governance-020609_en.pdf
European Commission 2007. Taking European knowledge society seriously: Report to the European Commission
. Directorate-General for Research [cited 22 July 2009]. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/european-knowledge-society_en.pdf
Felt, Ulrike, and Maximilian Fochler. 2008. The bottom-up meanings of the concept of public participation in science and technology. Science and Public Policy
Fjaestad, Bjorn. 2007. Why journalists report science as they do. In Journalism, science and society, eds. M.W. Bauer, and M. Bucchi. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.
Foucault, Michel. 2002. Truth and power. In Power: The essential works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 3, ed. J.D. Faubion. London: Penguin Books.
Frontier Economics. 2009. Assessing the impact of science centres in England. London: Frontier Economics Ltd.
Goldschmidt, Rüdiger, and Ortwin Renn. 2006. Meeting of minds
—European citizens’ deliberation on brain sciences: Final report of the external evaluation
2006. Available from http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/opus/volltexte/2007/3031/pdf/AB05_GoldschmidtRenn_EvaluationReport.pdf
Goodin, Robert E. 2008. Innovating democracy: democratic theory and practice after the deliberative turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gross, Alan. 1994. The roles of rhetoric in the public understanding of science. Public Understanding of Science
Habermas, Jürgen. 1970. The scientization of politics and public opinion. In Toward a rational society, ed. J. Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Further reflections on the public sphere. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. C. Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between facts and norms (trans: Rehg, W.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hagendijk, Rob, and Alan Irwin. 2006. Public deliberation and governance: Engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe. Minerva
Hendriks, Carolyn M. 2006. When the forum meets interest politics: Strategic uses of public deliberation. Politics and Society
HM Government in consultation with the Devolved Administrations 2005. The Government’s outline programme for public engagement on nanotechnologies
[cited 23 Nov 2010]. Available from http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file27705.pdf.
HM Treasury, and DIUS 2007. Science and innovation investment framework 2004
–2014, Annual Report 2007,
[cited 23 Nov 2007]. Available from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file40538.pdf
Holliman, R., R. Collins, E. Jensen, and P. Taylor. 2009. Isotope: Final report of the NESTA-funded project. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
House of Commons 2007. The governance of Britain (presented to Parliament by Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor)
. HMSO 2007. Available from http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm71/7170/7170.pdf
Irwin, Alan. 2001. Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science
Irwin, Alan. 2006. The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance. Social Studies of Science
Irwin, Alan, and Brian Wynne. 1996. Introduction. In Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science
, eds. A. Irwin, and B. Wynne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005. Designs on nature. Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kelly, Janet. 2000. Rethinking the elementary science methods course: A case for content, pedagogy and informal science education. International Journal of Science Education
Kerr, Anne, Sarah Cunningham-Burley, and Richard Tutton. 2007. Shifting subject positions: Experts and lay people in public dialogue. Social Studies of Science
Kitcher, Philip. 2001. Science, truth and democracy
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard: Harvard College.
Lehr, Jane. 2007. Democracy, scientific literacy and values in science education in the United States. In The re-emergence of values in science education, eds. D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, and R. Gunstone. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Lengwiler, Martin. 2008. Participatory approaches in science and technology. Science, Technology and Human Values
Logan, Robert A. 2001. Science mass communication: Its conceptual history. Science Communication
Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as social knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McNeil, Maureen. 2007. Feminist cultural studies of science and technology. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Mesure, S. 2007. The CreScENDO project: Final Report. (Creative Science Engagement
Networking, Development and Organisation—Commissioned by NESTA (National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts); unpublished.
Michael, Mike. 2002. Comprehension, apprehension, prehension: Heterogeneity and the public understanding of science. Science, Technology and Human Values 27(3): 357–378.
Miller, Steve. 2001. Public understanding of science at the crossroads. Public Understanding of Science
Negri, Antonio. 2009. Insurgencies: Constituent power and the modern state, 2nd Revised ed. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Nelkin, Dorothy. 1977. Technological decisions and democracy: European experiments in public participation. London: Sage.
Norris, Stepehen P. 1998. Intellectual independence for non-scientists and other content-transcendent goals of science education. Science Education
Norris, Christopher. 2005. Epistemology. London & New York: Continuum.
Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Oxford and Malden: Policy Press.
Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2003. Introduction: ‘Mode 2’ revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva
OST 2003. The forward look: Government funded science, engineering & technology (Report by the Office of Science & Technology)
2003 [cited 15 Apr 2010]. Available from http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file30223.pdf
Parkinson, John. 2006. Deliberating in the real world: Problems of legitimacy in deliberative democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pedretti, Erminia G. 2004. Perspectives on learning through research on critical issues-based science center exhibitions. Science Education
88(Suppl. 1): S34–S47.CrossRef
Pedretti, Erminia G. 2007. Challenging convention and communicating controversy: Learning through issues-based museum exhibitions. In In principle, in practice: Museums as learning institutions, eds. J. Falk, L. Dierking, and S. Foutz. New York: AltaMira Press.
Popper, Karl. 2002. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
POST 2006. Debating science
2006 [cited 15 Apr 2010]. Available from http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/postpn260.pdf
Rancière, Jacques. 1991. The ignorant schoolmaster. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rancière, Jacques. 1995. On the shores of politics. London and New York: Verso.
Rancière, Jacques. 2004. Introducing disagreement. Angelaki
Rancière, Jacques. 2006. Democracy, republic, representation. Constellations
Rancière, Jacques. 2007. Hatred of democracy. London: Verso.
Rancière, Jacques. 2010. Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London and New York: Continuum.
RCUK 2008. Beacons for public engagement: Bridging the gap between higher education and the public
2008 [cited 15 Apr 2010]. Available from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/cmsweb/downloads/rcuk/scisoc/beaconslaunch.pdf
Rowe, Gene, Tom Horlick-Jones, John Walls, and Nick Pidgeon. 2005. Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? Public debate about transgenic crops. Public Understanding of Science
Royal Society 2004. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. London: The Royal Society.
Royal Society 2006. Science and the public interest: communicating the results of new scientific research to the public
2006 [cited 15 Apr 2010]. Available from http://royalsociety.org/Science-and-the-public-interest-communicating-the-results-of-new-scientific-research-to-the-public/
Schmitter, Philippe. 1999. The future of democracy: Could it be a matter of scale? Social Research 66(3): 933–958.
Smith, Rogers M. 1997. Civic ideals: Conflicting visions of citizenship in US history. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Snively, Gloria, and John Consiglia. 2001. Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education. Science Education
Stengers, Isabelle. 2000. Another look: Relearning to laugh. Hypatia: Journal of Feminist Philosophy 15(4): 41–54.
Stewart, Angus. 2002. Hope and despair: Making sense of politics in the twenty-first century. British Journal of Sociology
Stirling, Andy. 2008. “Opening up” and “closing down”: power, participation and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology and Human Values
Sturgis, Patrick, and Nick Allum. 2004. Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science
The GM science review panel. 2004. GM science review .Second report
[cited 23 Nov 2010]. Available from http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file14992.pdf
Tlili, Anwar, Alan Cribb, and Sharon Gewirtz. 2006. What becomes of science in a science centre? Reconfiguring science for public consumption. Review of Education, Pedagogy and Cultural Studies 28(3): 203–228.
Trench, Brian. 2008. Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. In Communicating science in social contexts, eds. D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, and S. Shi. London: Springer.
Wagner, Wolfgang. 2007. Vernacular science knowledge: Its role in everyday life communication. Public Understanding of Science
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and society (trans: Fischoff, E. et al.), eds. Roth, G., and Wittich, C., Vol. 1. New York: Bedminster Press.
Weber, Max. 2004. The essential Weber. ed Whimster, S. London: Routledge.
Weigold, Michael F. 2001. Communicating science: A review of the literature. Science Communication
Wilsdon, James, and Rebecca Willis. 2004. See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. London: Demos.
Woolgar, Steve. 1991. The turn to technology in social studies of science. Science, Technology and Human Values
Wright, Susan. 2008. Governance as a regime of discipline. In Exploring regimes of discipline, ed. N. Dyck. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Wynne, Brian. 2006. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science—hitting the notes but missing the music? Community Genetics