Patterns of Subject Mix in Higher Education Institutions: A First Empirical Analysis Using the AQUAMETH Database
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Teaching and research are organised differently between subject domains: attempts to construct typologies of higher education institutions, however, often do not include quantitative indicators concerning subject mix which would allow systematic comparisons of large numbers of higher education institutions among different countries, as the availability of data for such indicators is limited. In this paper, we present an exploratory approach for the construction of such indicators. The database constructed in the AQUAMETH project, which includes also data disaggregated at the disciplinary level, is explored with the aim of understanding patterns of subject mix. For six European countries, an exploratory and descriptive analysis of staff composition divided in four large domains (medical sciences, engineering and technology, natural sciences and social sciences and humanities) is performed, which leads to a classification distinguishing between specialist and generalist institutions. Among the latter, a further distinction is made based on the presence or absence of a medical department. Preliminary exploration of this classification and its comparison with other indicators show the influence of long term dynamics on the subject mix of individual higher education institutions, but also underline disciplinary differences, for example regarding student to staff ratios, as well as national patterns, for example regarding the number of PhD degrees per 100 undergraduate students. Despite its many limitations, this exploratory approach allows defining a classification of higher education institutions that accounts for a large share of differences between the analysed higher education institutions.
- Balassa, Bela. 1965. Trade liberalization and ‘revealed’ comparative advantage. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 33: 99–123. CrossRef
- Becher, Tony, and Paul R. Trowler. 2001. Academic tribes and territories. Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Ballmoor: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
- Bleiklie, Ivar. 2003. Hierarchy and specialisation: On the institutional integration of higher education systems. European Journal of Education 38(4): 341–355. CrossRef
- Bonaccorsi, Andrea, and Cinzia Daraio. 2007a. Theoretical perspectives on university strategy. In Universities and strategic knowledge creation. Specialization and performance in Europe, eds. Andrea Bonaccorsi, and Cinzia Daraio, 3–30. Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.
- Bonaccorsi, Andrea, and Cinzia Daraio. 2007b. Universities and strategic knowledge creation. Specialization and performance in Europe. Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.
- Bonaccorsi, Andrea, and Cinzia Daraio. 2007c. Universities as strategic knowledge creators: Some preliminary evidence. In Universities and strategic knowledge creation. Specialization and performance in Europe, eds. Andrea Bonaccorsi, and Cinzia Daraio, 31–81. Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.
- Bonaccorsi, Andrea, Cinzia Daraio, Benedetto Lepori, and Stig Slipersaeter. 2007. Indicators on individual higher education institutions: Addressing data problems and comparability issues. Research Evaluation 16: 66–78. CrossRef
- Clark, Burton R. 1983. The higher education system. Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Clark, Burton R. 1995. Places of inquiry: Research and advanced education in modern universities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Filippini, Massimo, and Benedetto Lepori. 2007. Cost structure, economies of capacity utilization and scope in Swiss higher education institutions. In Universities and strategic knowledge creation. Specialization and performance in Europe, eds. Andrea Bonaccorsi, and Cinzia Daraio, 272–305. Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.
- Fumasoli, Tatiana and Benedetto Lepori. 2010. Patterns of strategies in Swiss higher education institutions. Submitted paper.
- Huisman, Jeroen, V. Lynn Meek, and Fiona Wood. 2007. Institutional diversity in higher education: A cross-national and longitudinal analysis. Higher Education Quarterly 61(4): 563–577. CrossRef
- Johnes, Jill. 1990. Unit costs: Some explanations of the differences between UK universities. Applied Economics 22(7): 853–862. CrossRef
- Jongbloed, Ben, Carlo Salerno, and Frans Kaiser. 2003. Kosten per student. Methodologie, schattingen en een internationale vergelijking. Enschede: CHEPs Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.
- Kyvik, Svein. 2004. Structural changes in higher education systems in Western Europe. Higher Education in Europe 29(3): 393–409. CrossRef
- Meek, V. Lynn, Leo Goedegebuure, Osmo Kivinen, and Risto Rinne. 1996. The mockers and mocked: Comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence and diversity in higher education. Oxford: Pergamon.
- Meek, V. Lynn, Leo Goedegebuure, and Jeroen Huisman. 2000. Editorial: Understanding diversity and differentiation in higher education: an overview. Higher Education Policy 13: 1–6. CrossRef
- Morphew, Christopher C. 2000. Institutional diversity, program acquisition and faculty members: Examining academic drift at a new level. Higher Education Policy 13: 55–77. CrossRef
- Musselin, Christine. 2007. Are Universities specific organisations? In Towards a multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions, eds. Georg Krücken, Anna Kosmützky, and Marc Torka, 63–84. Bielefeld: Transcript.
- Nederhof, Anton J. 2006. Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics 66(1): 81–100. CrossRef
- OECD. 2002. Frascati manual. Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- OECD. 2004. OECD handbook for internationally comparative education statistics. Concepts, standards, definitions and classifications. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- Rossi, Federica. 2009. Increased competition and diversity in higher education: An empirical analysis of the Italian University system. Higher Education Policy 22: 389–413. CrossRef
- Rothblatt, Sheldon, and Björn Wittrock. 1993. The European and American University since 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Rüegg, Walter. 2004. A history of the University in Europe, Vol. III: Universities in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Salancik, Gerald R., and Jeffrey Pfeffer. 1974. The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a University. The entity from which ERIC acquires the content, including journal, organization, and conference names, or by means of online submission from the author. Administrative Science Quarterly 19(4): 453–473. CrossRef
- Sarrico, Claudia S., Pedro Teixeira, Maria João Rosa, and Margarida F. Cardoso. 2009. Subject mix and productivity in Portuguese Universities. European Journal of Operational Research 197(1): 287–295. CrossRef
- van Vught, Frans. 2007. Diversity and differentiation in higher education systems. Oslo: The Norvegian Association of Higher Education Institutions, Jubileumsseminar i anledning Universitets- og høgskolerådets 50-årsjubileum.
- van Vught, Frans, Jeroen Bartelse, David Bohmert, Jon File, and Christiane Gaethgens. 2008. Mapping diversity. Developing a European classification of higher education institutions. Enschede: CHEPS Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.
- Patterns of Subject Mix in Higher Education Institutions: A First Empirical Analysis Using the AQUAMETH Database
Volume 48, Issue 1 , pp 73-99
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Subject mix
- Classification of higher education institutions
- Generalist vs. specialist
- Staff composition