Biagioli, Mario. 2006. Patent republic: Representing inventions, constructing rights and authors social research. Social Research 73: 1129–1172.
Böhme, Gernot. 2003. Contribution to the critique of the aesthetic economy. Thesis Eleven
Callon, Michel. 1994. Is science a public good? Science, Technology and Human Values
Coase, Ronald H. 1974. The market for goods and the market for ideas. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 64: 384–391.
Dale, Roger. 2007. Repairing the deficits of modernity: The emergence of parallel discourses in higher education in Europe. In World yearbook of higher education, eds. Debbie Epstein, Rebecca Boden, Rosemary Deem, Rizvi Fazal, and Susan Wright, 14–31. UK: Routledge.
Everett, Margaret. 2003. The social life of genes: Privacy, property and the new genetics. Social Science and Medicine
Geuna, Aldo, and Alessandro Muscio. 2009. The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of the literature. Minerva
Godelier, Maurice. 1999. The enigma of the gift. Oxford: Polity Press.
Green, Ronald M. 2001. What does it mean to use someone as “a means only”: Rereading Kant. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
Harvey, David. 2001. Spaces of capital: Towards a critical geography. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Haug, Wolfgang F.  1986. Critique of commodity aesthetics, trans. R. Bock. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Holland, S. 2001. Contested commodities at both ends of life: Buying and selling gametes, embryos, and body tissues. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
Katches, Mark, William Heisel, and Ronald Campbell. 2000. Donors don’t realize they are fueling a lucrative business. Orange County Register
(16 April). Online at http://www.ocregister.com/health-fitness/features/body/
index.shtml. cited in Holland, Suzanne 2001. Contested commodities at both ends of life: Buying and selling gametes, embryos, and body tissues. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
Kaushik Sunder, Rajan. 2006. Biocapital: The constitution of post-genomic life. Durham: Duke University Press.
Kitcher, Phillip. 2001. Science, truth, and democracy (Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Science). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kleinman, Daniel Lee, and Steven P. Vallas. 2001. Science, capitalism, and the rise of the “Knowledge Worker”: The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States. Theory and Society
Kopytoff, Igor. 1986. The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process. In The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective, ed. A. Appadurai. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Krimsky, Sheldon. 2003. Science in the private interest. Has the lure of profits corrupted biomedical research?. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. 1986. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.
Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1991. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge, trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Oxford, UK: Manchester University Press.
Mäki, Uskali. 1999. Science as a free market: A reflexivity test in an economics of economics. Perspectives on Science
Marx, Karl. 1990. Capital: A critique of political economy. Trans. Ben Fowkes, vol. 1. New York: Penguin.
McSherry, Corynne. 2001. Who owns academic work? Battling for control of intellectual property. USA: Harvard University Press.
Merton, Robert K. 1942. The normative structure of science. In The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations, ed. Robert K. Merton. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 1973.
Mirowski, Philip, and Esther Mirjam-Sent. 2002. Introduction. In Science bought and sold: Essays in the economics of science, eds. Philip Mirowski, and Esther Mirjam Sent, 1–66. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Mirowski, Philip, and Robert van Horn. 2005. The contract research organization and the commercialization of scientific research. Social Studies of Science
Morris, Ian. 1986. Gift and commodity in archaic Greece. Man
Owen-Smith, Jason. 2003. From separate systems to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across Public and Private Sciences at Research One Universities. Research Policy
Pestre, Dominique. 2005. The technosciences between markets, social worries and the political: How to imagine a better future? In The public nature of science under assault: Politics, markets, science and the law, eds. Helga Nowotny, Domique Pestre, Eberhard Schmidt-Aßmann, Helmut Schultze-Fielitz, and Hans-Heinrich Trute. Berlin: Springer.
Prasad, Amit. 2009. Capitalizing disease: Biopolitics of drug trials in India. Theory, Culture & Society
Radin, Margaret. 1996. Contested commodities: Trouble with trade in sex, children, body parts and other things. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
Rhoten, Diana, and William Powell. 2007. The frontiers of intellectual property: Expanded protection vs. new models of open science. Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Rip, Arie. 1994. The republic of science in the 1990s. Higher Education
Siegel, Donald S., Mike Wright, and Andy Lockett. 2007. The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: Organizational and societal implications. Industrial and Corporate Change
Stephan, P.E. 1996. The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature 34: 1199–1235.
Thrift, Nigel. 2006. Re-inventing invention: New tendencies in capitalist commodification. Economy and Society
Tinic, Serra A. 1997. United colors and untied meanings: Benetton and the commodification of social issues. Journal of Communication
Turner, Stephen. 2002. Scientists as agents. In Science bought and sold: Essays in the economics of science, eds. P. Mirowski, and E. Mirjam Sent, 362–384. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Valentin, Finn, and Rasmus Lund Jensen. 2006. Effects on academia–industry collaboration of extending university property rights. The Journal of Technology Transfer
Walstad, Allan. 2002. On science as a free market. Perspectives on Science
Weisbrod, Burton, Jeffrey Ballou, and Evelyn Asch. 2008. Mission and money: Understanding the university
. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Williams, Colin. 2002. A critical evaluation of the commodification thesis. The Sociological Review 525–542.