Date: 06 Jun 2009
Boundary-Work in the Health Research Field: Biomedical and Clinician Scientists’ Perceptions of Social Science Research
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Funding agencies in Canada are attempting to break down the organizational boundaries between disciplines to promote interdisciplinary research and foster the integration of the social sciences into the health research field. This paper explores the extent to which biomedical and clinician scientists’ perceptions of social science research operate as a cultural boundary to the inclusion of social scientists into this field. Results indicated that cultural boundaries may impede social scientists’ entry into the health research field through three modalities: (1) biomedical and clinician scientists’ unfavourable and ambivalent posture towards social science research; (2) their opposition to a resource increase for the social sciences; and (3) clinician scientists procedural assessment criteria for social science. The paper also discusses the merits and limitations of Tom Gieryn’s concept of boundary-work for studying social dynamics within the field of science.
Becher, Tony, and Paul R. Trowler. 2001. Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Bernier, Nicole F. 2005. Integrating political science into health sciences. In The social sciences and humanities in health research, ed. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 124–125. Ottawa: CIHR.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1975. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Sciences Information. Information Sur les Sciences Sociales 6: 19–47. doi:10.1177/053901847501400602.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. Sociology in question. London: Sage.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984 . Distinction. A social critique of the judgment of taste (trans: Nice, R.). London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996 . The Rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field (trans: Susan Emanuel.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2004 . Science of science and reflexivity (trans: Nice R.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loic Wacquant. 1992. Introduction to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clarke, Alan. 2001. The sociology of health care. New York: Prentice Hall.
CIHR–Canadian Institutes of Health Research. 2003. Investigating in Canada’s future: CIHR’s blueprint for health research and innovation. Ottawa. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/publications/20266.shtml.
CIHR–Canadian Institutes of Health Research. 2005. The social sciences and humanities in health research. Ottawa. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/publications/20266.shtml.
Creswell, John W. 1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
De Villiers, Jessica. 2005. Integrating the techniques of linguistic discourse into health sciences. In The social sciences and humanities in health research, ed. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 122–123. Ottawa: CIHR.
Giacomini, Mita K., and Deborah J. Cook. 2000. Users’ guides to the medical literature. Qualitative research in health care. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA Journal of the American Medical Association 284: 357–362.CrossRef
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1995. Boundaries of science. In Handbook of science and technology studies, ed. Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen, and Trevor Pinch, 343–393. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural boundaries of science. Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gordon, Deborah R. 1988. Clinical science and clinical expertise: Changing boundaries between art and science in medicine. In Biomedicine examined, ed. Margaret Lock, and Deborah R. Gordon, 257–295. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Government of Canada. 2000. Bill C-13. An act to establish the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
Greenhalgh, Trisha, and Rod Taylor. 1997. How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). BMJ. British Medical Journal 315: 740–743.
Guetzkow, Joshua, Michelle Lamont, and Grégoire Mallard. 2004. What is originality in the humanities and the social sciences? American Sociological Review 69(2): 190–212.CrossRef
Kendall, Carl. 1989. The use and non-use of anthropology: The diarrheal disease control program in Honduras. In Making our research useful, ed. John van Willigen, Barbara Rylko Bauer, and Ann McElroy, 283–303. Boulder: Westview Press.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic cultures. How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kuckelman Cobb, Ann, and Sarah Forbes. 2002. Qualitative research: What does it have to offer to the Gerontologists? Journal of Gerontology 57(4): 197–202.
MacMynowski, Dena P. 2007. Pausing at the brink of interdisciplinarity: Power and knowledge at the meeting of social and biophysical science. Ecology and Society 12(1): 1–14.
Mays, Nicholas, and Catherine Pope. 1995. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ. British Medical Journal 311: 109–112.
NIH–National Institutes of Health. 2007. NIH roadmap for medical research. http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/.
Ramsden, Edmund. 2002. Carving up population science: Eugenics, demography and the controversy over the ‘biological law’ of population growth. Social Studies of Science 32(5/6): 857–899.
Rowan, Margo, and Patricia Huston. 1997. Qualitative research articles: Information for authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal 157(10): 1442–1446.
Stokols, Daniel, Juliana Fuqua, Jennifer Gress, Richard Harvey, Kimari Phillips, Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati, Jennifer Unger, Paula Palmer, Melissa A. Clark, Suzanne M. Colby, Glen Morgan, and William Trochin. 2003. Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 5(Supp 1): S21–S39. doi:10.1080/14622200310001625555.CrossRef
Strauss, Anselm L., and Juliet M. Corbin. 1998. Introduction to qualitative research, grounded theory procedures and techniques. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Williams, Holly A., Caroline Jones, Martin Alilio, Susan Zimicki, Inez Azevedo, Isaac Nyamongo, Johannes Sommerfeld, Sylvia Meek, Samba Diop, Peter B. Bloland, and Brian Greenwood. 2002. The contribution of social science research to malaria prevention and control. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 80(3): 251–252.
- Boundary-Work in the Health Research Field: Biomedical and Clinician Scientists’ Perceptions of Social Science Research
Volume 47, Issue 2 , pp 171-194
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Health research
- Interdisciplinary research
- Scientific field
- Symbolic boundary
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Wilson Centre, University of Toronto, 200, Elizabeth Street, 1ES-559, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
- 2. Département de kinésiologie, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada