Reasoning About Agent Types and the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In this paper, we first propose a simple formal language to specify types of agents in terms of necessary conditions for their announcements. Based on this language, types of agents are treated as ‘first-class citizens’ and studied extensively in various dynamic epistemic frameworks which are suitable for reasoning about knowledge and agent types via announcements and questions. To demonstrate our approach, we discuss various versions of Smullyan’s Knights and Knaves puzzles, including the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever (HLPE) proposed by Boolos (in Harv Rev Philos 6:62–65, 1996). In particular, we formalize HLPE and verify a classic solution to it. Moreover, we propose a spectrum of new puzzles based on HLPE by considering subjective (knowledge-based) agent types and relaxing the implicit epistemic assumptions in the original puzzle. The new puzzles are harder than the previously proposed ones in the literature, in the sense that they require deeper epistemic reasoning. Surprisingly, we also show that a version of HLPE in which the agents do not know the others’ types does not have a solution at all. Our formalism paves the way for studying these new puzzles using automatic model checking techniques.
- Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., & Venema, Y. (2002). Modal logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
- Boolos, G. (1996). The hardest logic puzzle ever. The Harvard Review of Philosophy, 6, 62–65.
- Clarke, E. M., Grumberg, O., & Peled, D. A. (1999). Model Checking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- French, T., van der, Hoek, W., Iliev, P., & Kooi, B. P. (2011). Succinctness of epistemic languages. In: T. Walsh (Ed.) Proceedings of the twenty-second international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI), pp 881–886.
- Gerbrandy, J., & Groeneveld, W. (1997). Reasoning about information change. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6(2), 147–169. CrossRef
- Holliday, W., & Icard III. T. (2010). Moorean phenomena in epistemic logic. In: Advances in modal logic, pp 178–199.
- Liu, F. (2004). Dynamic variations: Update and revision for diverse agents. Master’s thesis, MoL-2004-05. ILLC, University of Amsterdam.
- Liu, F. (2009). Diversity of agents and their interaction. Journal of Logic,Language and Information, 18(1), 23–53. CrossRef
- Lutz, C. (2006). Complexity and succinctness of public announcement logic. In: P. Stone, G. Weiss (Eds.) Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS ’06), (pp. 137–143). New York, NY: ACM.
- Minică, S. (2011). Dynamic logic of questions. PhD thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
- Plaza, J. (2007). Logics of public communications. Synthese, 158(2), 165–179. CrossRef
- Rabern, B., & Rabern, L. (2008). A simple solution to the hardest logic puzzle ever. Logic and Analysis, 68, 105–112.
- Smullyan, R. (1978). What is the name of this book. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Uzquiano, G. (2010). How to solve the hardest logic puzzle ever in two questions. Logic and Analysis, 70, 39–44.
- van Benthem, J., & Minică, S. (2009). Toward a dynamic logic of questions. In: X. He, J. F. Horty, E. Pacuit (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on logic, rationality and interaction (LORI-II), vol. 5834, (pp. 27–41). Berlin: Springer, FoLLI-LNAI.
- van Ditmarsch, H. (2011). The Ditmarsch tale of wonders—dynamics of lying. Manuscript.
- van Ditmarsch, H., & Kooi, B. (2006). The secret of my success. Synthese, 153(2), 339–347 CrossRef
- van Ditmarsch,H. van der Hoek,W., & Kooi, B. (2007) Dynamic epistemic logic. Berlin: Springer.
- van Ditmarsch, H., van Eijck, J., Sietsma, F., & Wang, Y. (2011). On the logic of lying. In: J. van Eijck, R. Verbrugge (Eds.), Games, actions and social software, (pp 41–72). Berlin: Springer.
- Wang, Y. (2011a). On axiomatizations of PAL. In: H. van Ditmarsch, J. Lang,S. Ju (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3nd international workshop on logic, rationality and interaction (LORI-III), vol. 6953, pp. 314–327. Berlin: Springer, FoLLI-LNAI.
- Wang, Y. (2011b). Reasoning about protocol change and knowledge. In: M. Banerjee, A. Seth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Indian conference on logic and its applications (ICLA), vol 6521, pp. 189–203. Berlin: Springer, LNCS.
- Wheeler, G. R., & Barahona, P. (2012). Why the hardest logic puzzle ever cannot be solved in less than three questions. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41(2), 493–503. CrossRef
- Wintein, S. (2011). On the behavior of true and false. Minds and Machines, 22(1), 1–24. CrossRef
- Reasoning About Agent Types and the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever
Minds and Machines
Volume 23, Issue 1 , pp 123-161
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Agent types
- Public announcement logic
- Questioning strategy
- Knight and Knaves
- The hardest logic puzzle ever
- Industry Sectors