Computationalism: Still the Only Game in Town
- David Davenport
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Mental representations, Swiatczak (Minds Mach 21:19–32, 2011) argues, are fundamentally biochemical and their operations depend on consciousness; hence the computational theory of mind, based as it is on multiple realisability and purely syntactic operations, must be wrong. Swiatczak, however, is mistaken. Computation, properly understood, can afford descriptions/explanations of any physical process, and since Swiatczak accepts that consciousness has a physical basis, his argument against computationalism must fail. Of course, we may not have much idea how consciousness (itself a rather unclear plurality of notions) might be implemented, but we do have a hypothesis—that all of our mental life, including consciousness, is the result of computational processes and so not tied to a biochemical substrate. Like it or not, the computational theory of mind remains the only game in town.
- Bickhard, M. H., & Terveen, L. (1995). Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: Impasse and solution. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
- Bishop, M. (2009). Why computers can’t feel pain. Minds and Machines, 19, 507–516. doi:10.1007/s11023-009-9173-3. CrossRef
- Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about the function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 227–247. CrossRef
- Chalmers, D. (1995a). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, 200–219.
- Chalmers, D. (1995b). On implementing a computation. Minds and Machines, 4, 391–402. CrossRef
- Clark, R. E., Manns, J. R., & Squire, L. R. (2002). Classical conditioning, awareness, and brain systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 524–531. CrossRef
- Davenport, D. (2000). Computationalism: The very idea. Conceptus studien 14, Fall.
- Davenport, D. (2012). The two (computational) faces of AI. In V. M. Müller (Ed.), Theory and Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. SAPERE, Berlin: Springer.
- Demir, H. (2010). The fourth revolution: Philosophical foundations and technological implications. Knowledge Technology Policy, 23(1–2), 1–6. CrossRef
- Denning, P. J. (2007) Computing is a natural science. Communications of the ACM, 50(7), 13. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?.
- Dreyfus, H. (1972). What computers can’t do. New York: Harper and Row.
- Floridi, L. (2009). Outline of a theory of truth as correctness for semantic information. Erkenntnis, 74(2), 147–175. CrossRef
- Floridi, L. (2010) The digital revolution as a fourth revolution. http://www.philosophyofinformation.net/massmedia/pdf/bbc-1.pdf
- Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Kandel, E. R. (2001). The molecular biology of memory storage: A dialogue between genes and synapses. Science, 294(5544), 1030–1038. doi:10.1126/science.1067020. CrossRef
- Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(03), 417–424. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00005756. CrossRef
- Swiatczak, B. (2011) Conscious representations: An intractable problem for the computational theory of mind. Minds and Machines, 21, 19–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9214-y. doi:10.1007/s11023-010-9214-y.
- Van Gulick, R. (2011) Consciousness. In Zalta E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer 2011 edn).
- Computationalism: Still the Only Game in Town
Minds and Machines
Volume 22, Issue 3 , pp 183-190
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Computational theory of mind
- Mental representation
- Industry Sectors
- David Davenport (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Computer Engineering Department, Bilkent University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey