An Ontology-Based Approach to Metaphor Cognitive Computation
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Language understanding is one of the most important characteristics for human beings. As a pervasive phenomenon in natural language, metaphor is not only an essential thinking approach, but also an ingredient in human conceptual system. Many of our ways of thinking and experiences are virtually represented metaphorically. With the development of the cognitive research on metaphor, it is urgent to formulate a computational model for metaphor understanding based on the cognitive mechanism, especially with the view to promoting natural language understanding. Many works have been done in pragmatics and cognitive linguistics, especially the discussions on metaphor understanding process in pragmatics and metaphor mapping representation in cognitive linguistics. In this paper, a theoretical framework for metaphor understanding based on the embodied mechanism of concept inquiry is proposed. Based on this framework, ontology is introduced as the knowledge representation method in metaphor understanding, and metaphor mapping is formulated as ontology mapping. In line with the conceptual blending theory, a revised conceptual blending framework is presented by adding a lexical ontology and context as the fifth mental space, and a metaphor mapping algorithm is proposed.
Supplementary Material (0)
- Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), 91–130. CrossRef
- Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., & Patel-Schneider, P. (2003). The description logic handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Boden, M. A. (2003). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Routledge.
- Chen, K. J., Shu-Ling, H., Yueh-Yin, S., & Yi-Jun, C. (2005). Extended-hownet: A representational framework for concepts. In OntoLex 2005—ontologies and lexical resources IJCNLP-05 workshop, Jeju Island, South Korea.
- Dong, Z. D., & Dong, Q. (2006). Hownet and the computation of meaning. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company. CrossRef
- Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187. CrossRef
- Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. London: Basic Books.
- Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170. CrossRef
- Gomez-Perez, A., & Corcho, O. (2002). Ontology languages for the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(4), 54–60. CrossRef
- Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1997). Blending and metaphor. In W. G. Raymond, & J. S. Gerard (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Gruber, T. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specification. Knowledge Acquisition, 5, 199–220. CrossRef
- Guarino, N. (1998). Formal ontology and information systems. In Proceedings of 1st International conference on formal ontology in information systems (FOIS’98) (pp. 3–5). Trento, Italy: The IOS Press.
- Huang, X. X. (2009). Research on some key issues of metaphor computation. PhD thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China (in Chinese).
- Huang, X. X., & Zhou, C. L. (2005). A logical approach for metaphor understanding. In Proceedings of 2005 IEEE International conference on natural language processing and knowledge engineering (pp. 268–271). Wuhan, China: IEEE Computer Society.
- Huang, X. X., & Zhou C. L. (2007). An owl-based wordnet lexical ontology. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science A), 8(6), 864–870. CrossRef
- Huang, X. X., Huang, H. X., Xu, C. H., Chen, W., & Wang, R. B. (2011). A novel a novel pattern matching method for chinese metaphor identification and classification. In Proceedings of the 2011 International conference on artificial intelligence and computational intelligence (AICI’11) (pp. 104–114). Taiyuan, China: Springer.
- Johnson, M. (1989). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Kittay, E. F. (1987). Metaphor, its cognitive force and linguistic structure. Oxford, USA: Oxford University Press.
- Kovecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic books.
- Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: Chicago University Press. CrossRef
- Maedche, A., & Volz, R. (2001). The ontology extraction and maintenance framework text-to-onto. In Proceedings of the ICDM’ 01 workshop on integrating data mining and knowledge management, California, USA (pp. 1–12).
- Mason, Z. J. (2004). Cormet: A computational, corpus-based conventional metaphor extraction system. Computational Linguistics, 30(1), 23–44. CrossRef
- Miller, G. A. (1993). Images and models, similes and metaphors. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, metaphor and thought (pp. 357–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Ogden, C. K., & Richards, I. A. (1989). The meaning of meaning. New York: Mariner Books.
- Pereira, F. C. (2007). Creativity and artificial intelligence: A conceptual blending approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Shutova, E. (2010). Models of metaphor in nlp. In Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, Uppsala, Sweden (pp. 688–697).
- Sowa, J. F. (2000). Knowledge representation: Logical, philosophical, and computational foundations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing Co.
- Steinhart, E. C. (2001). The logic of metaphor: Analogous parts of possible worlds. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Veale, T. (1995). Metaphor, memory and meaning: Symbolic and connectionist issues in metaphor interpretation. PhD thesis, Trinity College, Dublin.
- Yang, Y., Zhou, C. L., Ding, X. J., Chen, J. W., & Shi, X. D. (2009). Metaphor recognition: Chmeta, a pattern-based system. Computational Intelligence, 25(4), 265–301. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.2009.00349.x. CrossRef
- Zhou, C. L. (2003). Introduction to mind computation. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
- Zhou, C. L., Yang, Y., & Huang, X. X. (2007). Computational mechanisms for metaphor in languages: A survey. Journal Computer Science and Technology, 22(2), 308–319. CrossRef
About this Article
- An Ontology-Based Approach to Metaphor Cognitive Computation
Minds and Machines
Volume 23, Issue 1 , pp 105-121
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Conceptual blending
- Cognitive science
- Embodied cognition
- Industry Sectors