Bechtel, W. (1998), ‘Representations and Cognitive Explanations: Assessing the Dynamicist Challenge in Cognitive Science’, Cognitive Science 22, pp. 295–318. Also available at http: //www.artsci.wustl.edu/ ~bill / REPRESENT.html.
Bickle, J. 1998Psychoneural Reduction: the New WaveMIT PressCambridge MA
Churchland, P. 1989A Neurocomputational PerspectiveMIT PressCambridge MA
Clark, P. (1999), ‘ Startup Implements Silicon Neural: Net in Learning Processor’ in EE Times. Also available at <http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG19990914S0033>.
Dennett, D. 1991Consciousness ExplainedMIT PressCambridge, MA
Dreyfus, H.L. 1972What Computers Still Can’t Do.MIT PressCambridge, MA
Dreyfus H.L. (1996), ‘The Current Relevance of Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Embodiment’.http://hci.stanford.edu/cs378/reading/dreyfusembodiment.htm.
Dewey (1896), ‘The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology’. http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Dewey/reflex.htm.
Eliasmith, C. (1996). ‘The Third Contender: A Critical Examination of the Dynamicist Theory of Cognition’, Philosophical Psychology. ‘9 (4), pp. 441–463. Reprinted in P. Thagard (ed) (1998), Mind Readings: Introductory Selections in Cognitive Science. MIT Press.
Finger, S. eds. 1978Recovery from Brain DamagePlenum PressNew York
Fodor, J. 1983The Modularity of MindMIT PressCambridge, MA
Fodor, J. (1985) ‘Précis of The Modularity of Mind ’ published in Minds Brains and Computers (2000) Edited by Cummins and Cummins. Blackwell Publishers. London, first published in Behavior and Brain Sciences, 8, 1985.
Fodor, J. and Pylyshyn Z. (1988), ‘Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis’, in Haugeland 1997.
Freeman, W. 2000How Brains Make up their MindsColumbia University PressNew York
Haugeland, J. eds. 1985Artificial Intelligence: The Very IdeaMIT PressCambridge, MA
Haugeland, J. eds. 1997Mind Design IIMIT PressCambridge,MA
Kandel, E., Schwartz, J., Jessel, T. 2000Principles of NeuroscienceMc Graw-Hill/Appleton & LangeNew York, NY
Kelso, , Scott , J.A. 1995Dynamic PatternsMIT PressCambridge, MA
Laurence and Stein (1978) ‘Recovery after Brain Damage and the Concept of Localization of Function’, in Finger (1978).
MacKay, W.A. (1980) ‘The Motor Program: Back to the Computer’, in Trends in Neurosciences – April 1980, pp. 97–100.
McCarthy, J. (1960), Recursive Functions of Symbolic Expressions and Their Computation by Machine, Part I Communications of the ACM (Association for Computing Machinery), April.
Minsky (1985), ‘The Society of Mind’. New York, Simon and Schuster.
Port, R.F.Van Gelder, T. eds. 1995Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of CognitionMIT PressCambridge, MA
Ramsey, Stich, Garon , 1991
‘Connectionism, Eliminativism and the Future of Folk Psychology’Stich, S.Rumelhart, D.Ramsey, W. eds. Philosophy and Connectionist TheoryLawrence Erlbaum Associates.Hillsdale, NJ.
Rockwell, W. T. (1995), ‘Can Reductionism be Eliminated?’, presented at the American Philosophy Association Meeting (Pacific division) in San Francisco (with commentary by John Bickle). rewritten as ‘Beyond Eliminative Materialism’, http://www.california.com/ ~mcmf /beyondem.html.
Stehouwer, D.J., Farel, P.B. 1983‘Development of Hindlimb Locomotor Activity in the Bullfrog’.Development Psychobiology17217232CrossRef
Taylor, R.C. 1978‘Why Change Gaits? Recruitment of Muscles and Muscle Fibers as a Function of Speed and Gait’American Zoologist18153161
Thelen, E., Smith, L. 1994‘A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action’MIT PressCambridge, MA
Uttal, W.R. 2001The New PhrenologyMIT PressCambridge, MA
Van Gelder, T. 1991
‘What is the ‘D’ in ‘PDP’? An Overview of the Concept of Distribution’Stich, S.Rumelhart, D.Ramsey, W. eds. Philosophy and Connectionist TheoryLawrence Erlbaum Associates.Hillsdale, NJ.
Van Gelder, T. (1995) ‘What Might Cognition Be If Not Computation?’ Journal of Philosophy 92, 345–381. Reprinted as: The Dynamical Alternative, in Johnson, D. & Erneling, C, eds., Reassessing the Cognitive Revolution: Alternative Futures. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.
Van Gelder, T. (1996), “The Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science” and “Authors Response” Behavior and Brain Sciences.
Watson, S.J., Beckoff, A. 1990‘A Kinematic Analysis of Hindlimb Mobility in 9- and 10-day Old Chick Embryos’.Journal of Neurobiology21651660CrossRef