Skip to main content
Log in

The ethics of clinical photography and social media

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinical photography is an important tool for medical practice, training and research. While in the past clinical pictures were confined to the stringent controls of surgeries and hospitals technological advances have made possible to take pictures and share them through the internet with only a few clicks. Confronted with this possibility I explore if a case could be made for using clinical photography in tandem with social media. In order to do this I explore: (1) if patient’s informed consent is required for the publication of any clinical images that depicts her, irrespective of whether the patient can be identified from the image or not, (2) if social media is an adequate place for clinical images to be displayed, and finally (3) if there are special considerations that should be taken into account when publishing clinical images on social media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this article I will not elaborate on the connection between my arguments and particular data protection laws (that most of the times are grounded on the concepts of privacy and informed consent) because that would vastly exceed the scope of the paper and also because I want to focus on the ethics of clinical photography independently considered of state regulations. Nevertheless, for an interesting discussion of the US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act see Sobel (2007) and Rothstein (2013), and for a discussion on data protection regulation in the EU see Fears et al. (2014).

  2. I think, other things being equal, that the arguments that I advance here also apply for the type of consent required for the use of radiological images and pathology images for primary and secondary purposes.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wish to acknowledge the stimulus and support of the iSEI Wellcome Strategic Programme in The Human Body: Its scope, limits and future (Grant Number: WT 087439/Z/08/Z) and Mexico’s National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT). I am also grateful to Adriana Clavel-Vázquez, Sarah Chan, John Harris, Nicolas Agar and Ian Berle for their comments on an earlier version of this article. Finally, I also wish to thank the comments provided by the members of the Centre for Social Ethics and Policy and the Institute for Science, Ethics and Innovation at The University of Manchester after a verbal presentation of a previous version of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to César Palacios-González.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palacios-González, C. The ethics of clinical photography and social media. Med Health Care and Philos 18, 63–70 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9580-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9580-y

Keywords

Navigation