Merleau-Ponty’s sexual schema and the sexual component of body integrity identity disorder
- Helena De Preester
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Body integrity identity disorder (BIID), formerly also known as apotemnophilia, is characterized by a desire for amputation of a healthy limb and is claimed to straddle or to even blur the boundary between psychiatry and neurology. The neurological line of approach, however, is a recent one, and is accompanied or preceded by psychodynamical, behavioural, philosophical, and psychiatric approaches and hypotheses. Next to its confusing history in which the disorder itself has no fixed identity and could not be classified under a specific discipline, its sexual component has been an issue of unclarity and controversy, and its assessment a criterion for distinguishing BIID from apotemnophilia, a paraphilia. Scholars referring to the lived body—a phenomenon primarily discussed in the phenomenological tradition in philosophy—seem willing to exclude the sexual component as inessential, whereas other authors notice important similarities with gender identity disorder or transsexualism, and thus precisely focus attention on the sexual component. This contribution outlines the history of BIID highlighting the vicissitudes of its sexual component, and questions the justification for distinguishing BIID from apotemnophilia and thus for omitting the sexual component as essential. Second, we explain a hardly discussed concept from Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception (1945a), the sexual schema, and investigate how the sexual schema could function in interaction with the body image in an interpretation of BIID which starts from the lived body while giving the sexual component its due.
- Bayne, T., and N. Levy. 2005. Amputees by choice: Body integrity identity disorder and the ethics of amputation. Journal of Applied Philosophy 22(1): 75–86. CrossRef
- Becerra, R. 2004. “Atmosphere”, a precursor of “cognitive schemas”: Tracing tacit phenomenological influences on cognitive behaviour therapy. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 4(1): 1–13.
- Bensler, J.M., and D.S. Paauw. 2003. Apotemnophilia masquerading as medical morbidity. Cse report. Southern Medical Association 96(7): 674–676. CrossRef
- Blanke, O., F.D. Morgenthaler, P. Brugger, and L.S. Overney. 2009. Preliminary evidence for a fronto-parietal dysfunction in able-bodied participant with a desired for limb amputation. Journal of Neuropsychology 3: 181–200. CrossRef
- Brang, D., P.D. McGeoch, and V.S. Ramachandran. 2008. Apotemnophilia: A neurological disorder. Neuroreport: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology 19(13): 1305–1306.
- De Preester, H., and M. Tsakiris. 2009. Body-extension versus body- incorporation: Is there a need for a body-model? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8(3): 307–319. CrossRef
- Donix, M., and T. Reuster. 2007. ‘Apotemnophilie. Zur diagnostischen Klassifikation zwischen Paraphilie und Körper-Integritäts-Identitätsstörung’. Nervenheilkund 6: 477–479.
- Dyer, C. 2000. Surgeon amputated healthy legs. British Medical Journal 320: 332. CrossRef
- Everaerd, W. 1983. A case of ampotemnophilia: A handicap as sexual preference. American Journal of Psychotherapy 37(2): 285–293.
- First, M.B. 2004. Desire for amputation of a limb: Paraphilia, psychosis, or a new type of identity disorder. Psychological Medicine 35: 919–928. CrossRef
- Freund, K., and R. Blanchard. 1993. Erotic target location error in male gender dysphorics, paedophiles, and fetishists. British Journal of Psychiatry 162: 558–563. CrossRef
- Furth, G.M., and R. Smith. 2000. Amputee identity disorder: Information, questions, answers, and recommendations about self-demand amputation. Bloomington, IN: 1st Books.
- Gallagher, S., and J. Cole. 1995. Body schema and body image in a differenced subject. Journal of Mind and Behaviour 16: 369–390.
- Gallagher, S., and A.N. Meltzoff. 1996. The earliest sense of self and others: Merleau-Ponty and recent developmental studies. Philosophical Psychology 9(2): 211–233. CrossRef
- Hilti, L.M., and P. Brugger. 2010. Incarnation and animation: Physical versus representational deficits of body integrity. Experimental Brain Research 204: 315–326. CrossRef
- Johnston, J., and C. Elliott. 2002. Healthy limb amputation: Ethical and legal aspects. Clinical Medicine 2(5): 431–435. CrossRef
- Kant, Immanuel. [1781/1787] 1998. Critique of Pure Reason (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant in Translation). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kasten, E. 2009. Body integrity identity disorder (BIID): Befragung von Betroffenen und Erklärungsansätze. Fortschritte der Neurologie Psychiatrie 77(1): 16–24. CrossRef
- Lawrence, A.A. 2006. Clinical and theoretical parallels between desire for limb amputation and gender identity disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior 35(3): 263–278. CrossRef
- Lowenstein, L.F. 2002. Fetishes and their associated behavior. Sexuality and Disability 20(2): 135–147. CrossRef
- McGeoch, P.D., Brang, D.J., and Ramachandran, V.S. 2009. A new right parietal syndrome? In Body integrity disorder: psychological, neurobiological, ethical and legal aspects, eds. Stirn, A., Thiel, A., Oddo, S, 225–237. Lengerich: PABST Science Publishers.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. 1945a. Phénoménologie de la Perception. Paris: Gallimard.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. [1945b] 2002. Phenomenology of perception (Trans: Smith, C). London/New York: Routledge.
- Money, J., R. Jobaris, and G. Furth. 1977. Apotemnophilia: Two cases of self-demand amputation as a paraphilia. The Journal of Sex Research 13(2): 115–125. CrossRef
- Money, J. 1984. Paraphilias–phenomenology and classification. American Journal of Psychotherapy 38(2): 164–179.
- Money, J., and K.W. Simcoe. 1986. Acrotomophilia, sex and disability: New concepts and case report. Sexuality and Disability 7(1/2): 43–50.
- Patrone, D. 2011. Disfigured anatomies and imperfect analogies: Body integrity identity disorder and the supposed right to self-demanded amputation of healthy body parts. Journal of Medical Ethics 35: 541–545. CrossRef
- Person, E.S. 1980. Sexuality as the mainstay of identity: Psychoanalytic perspectives. Signs 5(4): 605–630. CrossRef
- Rossetti, Y., G. Rode, and A. Farnè. 2005. Implicit body representations in action. In Body image and body schema, ed. H. De Preester, and V. Knockaert, 111–125. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
- Rubin, H.S. 1998. Phenomenology as method in trans studies. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 4(2): 263–281.
- Schwoebel, J., and H.B. Coslett. 2005. Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(4): 543–553. CrossRef
- Slatman, J., and G. Widdershoven. 2009. Being whole after amputation. The American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9(1): 48–49. CrossRef
- Slatman, J., and G. Widdershoven. 2010. Hand transplants and bodily integrity. Body and Society 16(3): 69–92. CrossRef
- Sorene, E.D., C. Heras-Palou, and F.D. Burke. 2006. Self-amputation of a healthy hand: A case of body integrity identity disorder. Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume) 31B(6): 593–595.
- Stoller, R.J. 1974. The Samuel Novey lecture–does sexual perversion exist? Johns Hopkins Medical Journal 1: 43–57.
- Wakefield, P.L., A. Frank, and R.W. Meyers. 1977. The hobbyist–euphemism for self-mutilation and fetishism. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 41(6): 539–552.
- Wise, T.N., and R.C. Kalyanam. 2000. Amputee fetishism and genital mutilation: Case report and literature review. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 2000: 339–344.
- Merleau-Ponty’s sexual schema and the sexual component of body integrity identity disorder
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
Volume 16, Issue 2 , pp 171-184
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Lived body
- Sexual schema
- Body image
- Industry Sectors
- Helena De Preester (1) (2)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- 2. Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium