Climate change and Norman Daniels’ theory of just health: an essay on basic needs
First Online: 13 September 2011 DOI:
10.1007/s11019-011-9349-5 Cite this article as: Lacey, J. Med Health Care and Philos (2012) 15: 3. doi:10.1007/s11019-011-9349-5 Abstract
Norman Daniels, in applying Rawls’ theory of justice to the issue of human health, ideally presupposes that society exists in a state of moderate scarcity. However, faced with problems like climate change, many societies find that their state of moderate scarcity is increasingly under threat. The first part of this essay aims to determine the consequences for Daniels’ theory of just health when we incorporate into Rawls’ understanding of justice the idea that the condition of moderate scarcity can fail. Most significantly, I argue for a generation-neutral principle of basic needs that is lexically prior to Rawls’ familiar principles of justice. The second part of this paper aims to demonstrate how my reformulated version of Daniels’ conception of just health can help to justify action on climate change and guide climate policy within liberal-egalitarian societies.
Keywords Basic needs Climate change Climate policy Global justice Health Healthcare John Rawls Norman Daniels References
Bell, D. 2004. Environmental justice and Rawls’ difference principle.
Environmental Ethics 26(3): 287–306.
Brock, D. 2000. ‘Broadening the Bioethics Agenda’/
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 10(1): 21–38.
Confalonieri, U., B. Menne, R. Akhtar, K.L. Ebi, M. Hauengue, R.S. Kovats, B. Revich and A. Woodward. 2007. ‘Human Health’. In
Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group ii to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 391–431. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daniels, N. 2008.
Just health: Meeting health needs fairly. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Daniels, N. 2009. Just health: Replies and further thoughts.
Journal of Medical Ethics
Environmental Protection Agency. 2009. Endangerment and cause or contribute findings for greenhouse gases under section 202(a) of the clean air act; Final rule, Federal Register/vol. 74, no. 239/Tuesday, December 15, 2009,
. Accessed 30/03/2010.
Mann, M.E. 2009. Do global warming and climate change represent a serious threat to our welfare and environment?
Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (2): 193–230.
Manning, R. 1988. Environmental ethics and John Rawls’ theory of justice.
Environmental Ethics 3(2): 155–166.
Marmot, M. 2005. Social determinants of health inequalities.
Pogge, T. 2007. trans. Kosch, M. John Rawls: His life and theory of justice. NY: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. 2003.
A theory of justice revised edition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. 2005.
Political liberalism. NY: Columbia University Press.
Segall, S. 2007. Is health care (still) special?
Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (3): 342–361.
Thero, D.P. 1995. Rawls and environmental ethics: A critical examination of the literature.
Environmental Ethics 17(1): 93–106.
Human development report 2007/2008—Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world. NY: Pelgrave McMillan.
Wilson, J. 2009. Not so special after all? Daniels and the social determinants of health.
Journal of Medical Ethics
Protecting human health from climate change: Connecting science, policy and people
. Accessed 20 May 2010.
WHO, WMO, UNEP. 2003.
Climate change and Human Health: Risks and responses. Summary,
. Accessed 18 March 2010.
Wolff, C. 2009. Intergenerational justice, human needs and climate policy. In
Intergenerational justice, ed. A. Gossiers, and L.H. Meyer. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011