Supererogation in clinical research
- Deborah R. Barnbaum
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
‘Supererogation’ is the notion of going beyond the call of duty. The concept of supererogation has received scrutiny in ethical theory, as well as clinical bioethics. Yet, there has been little attention paid to supererogation in research ethics. Supererogation is examined in this paper from three perspectives: (1) a summary of two analyses of ‘supererogation’ in moral theory, as well as an examination as to whether acts of supererogation exist; (2) a discussion of supererogation in clinical practice, including arguments that both physicians and patients can practice acts of supererogation; (3) a discussion as to why researchers, qua researchers, are not routinely recognized to perform acts of supererogation, while at the same time the very nature of research subject participation involves supererogation. The article concludes by considering three examples of supererogation on the part of researchers, with a plea that researchers’ supererogatory actions be recognized as such.
- Brown, B.F. 2006. Proxy consent for the incompetent elderly. In Biomedical ethics, eds. T.A. Mappes and D. DeGrazia, 240–247. New York: McGraw Hill.
- Callahan, D. 2003. What price better health? Hazards of the research imperative. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
- Downie, R.S. 2002. Supererogation and altruism: A comment. Journal of Medical Ethics 28(2): 75–76. CrossRef
- Glannon, W., and Ross, L. 2002. Are doctors altruistic? Journal of Medical Ethics 28(2): 68–69. CrossRef
- Heyd, D. 1982. Supererogation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- King, N.M.P. 2000. Defining and describing benefit appropriately in clinical trials. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 28: 332–343. CrossRef
- Kottow, M.H. 1990. Against the magnanimous in medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 16(3): 124–128. CrossRef
- McKay, A.C. 2002. Supererogation and the profession of medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics 28(2): 70–73. CrossRef
- Mellema, G. 1991. Beyond the call of duty: Supererogation, obligation and offence. Albany, New York: SUNY University Press.
- Nuremberg Code, 1948. In Research ethics: Text and readings,eds. D.R. Barnbaum and M. Byron, 2001, 28–29. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Standord Online Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ‘Supererogation’, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supererogation/. Accessed September 7 2006.
- Thomasma, D.C., and Kushner, T. 1995. A dialogue on compassion and supererogation in medicine. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4(4): 415–425. CrossRef
- Urmson, J.O. 1958. Saints and heroes. In Essays in moral philospohy, ed. A.I. Melden, 198–216. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
- Supererogation in clinical research
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
Volume 11, Issue 3 , pp 343-349
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Ethical theory
- Research ethics
- Research participants
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, Kent State University, P.O. Box 5190, Kent, OH, 44242-0001, USA