Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 199–205

Doing the best for one’s child: satisficing versus optimizing parentalism

Commentary

DOI: 10.1007/s11017-012-9222-4

Cite this article as:
Blustein, J. Theor Med Bioeth (2012) 33: 199. doi:10.1007/s11017-012-9222-4

Abstract

The maxim “parents should do what is in the best interests of their child” seems like an unassailable truth, and yet, as I argue here, there are serious problems with it when it is taken seriously. One problem concerns the sort of demands such a principle places on parents; the other concerns its larger social implications when conceived as part of a national policy for the rearing of children. The theory of parenting that creates these problems I call “optimizing parentalism.” To avoid them, I define and defend a new and more morally appealing theory, “satisficing parentalism.”

Keywords

Best interests of the child Child-centered society Consequentialism Optimizing parentalism Parental obligation Parental independence Satisficing parentalism 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.City CollegeCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations