The metaphysical basis of a liberal organ procurement policy Authors
First Online: 13 July 2010 DOI:
Cite this article as: Hershenov, D.B. & Delaney, J.J. Theor Med Bioeth (2010) 31: 303. doi:10.1007/s11017-010-9151-z Abstract
There remains a need to properly analyze the metaphysical assumptions underlying two organ procurement policies: presumed consent and organ sales. Our contention is that if one correctly understands the metaphysics of both the human body and material property, then it will turn out that while organ sales are illiberal, presumed consent is not. What we mean by
illiberal includes violating rights of bodily integrity, property, or autonomy, as well as arguing for or against a policy in a manner that runs afoul of Rawlsian public reason. Keywords Presumed consent Bodily integrity Public reason References
Radin, Margaret. 1982. Property and personhood.
Stanford Law Review
Veatch, Robert, and Jonathan Pitt. 1995. The myth of presumed consent: Ethical problems in new organ procurement strategies.
Transplantation Proceedings 27: 1888–1892.
Hershenov, David. 2005. Are dead bodies a problem for the biological account of personal identity?
Hershenov, David. 2009. Organisms and their bodies.
Olson, Eric. 1997.
The human animal: Identity without psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Olson, Eric. 2004. Animalism and the corpse problem.
Australasian Journal of Philosophy
Baker, Lynne. 2000.
Persons and bodies: A constitution view. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feldman, Fred. 1992.
Confrontations with the reaper. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shoemaker, Sydney. 1999. Eric Olson: The human animal.
LaPorte, Joseph. 2009. On two reasons for denying that bodies can outlast life.
Mackie, David. 1999. Personal identity and dead people.
Olson, Eric. 1995. Why I have no hands.
Theoria 61: 159–181.
Olson, Eric. 2007.
What are we? An essay in personal ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, John. 2005.
Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
McMahan, Jeff. 2002.
The ethics of killing: Problems at the margins of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hudson, Hud. 2001.
A materialist metaphysics of the human person. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Parfit, Derek. 1984.
Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Plantinga, Alvin. 2006. Against materialism.
Faith and Philosophy 23: 3–32.
Swinburne, Richard. 1997.
The evolution of the soul
. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Unger, Peter. 2007.
All the powers in the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, George.  1942.
Philosophy of right. Trans. Thomas Malcolm Knox. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kant, Immanuel.  1965.
Lectures on ethics. Trans. Louis Infield. New York: Harper and Row.
Locke, John.  1966.
The second treatise of civil government. Ed. John W. Gough. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hershenov, David, and James Delaney. 2009. Mandatory autopsies and organ conscription.
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
Dworkin, Gerald. 1994. The case for organ sales. In
Morality, harm and the law, ed. Gerald Dworkin, 157–161. Boulder: Westview Press.
Shoemaker, David. 2005. Embryos, souls and the fourth dimension.
Social Theory and Practice 31: 51–75.
Sider, Ted. 2001.
Four-dimensionalism: An ontology of persistence and time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prosser, William. 1955.
Law of torts. St. Paul: West Law. Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010