The hedgehog and the Borg: Common morality in bioethics
- John D. Arras
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In this commentary, I critically discuss the respective views of Gert and Beauchamp–Childress on the nature of so-called common morality and its promise for enriching ethical reflection within the field of bioethics. Although I endorse Beauchamp and Childress’ shift from an emphasis on ethical theory as the source of moral norms to an emphasis on common morality, I question whether rouging up common morality to make it look like some sort of ultimate and universal foundation for morality, untouched by the dialectics of time and reflective equilibrium, was an equally good move. As for Gert’s magisterial conception of common morality, I conclude that certain elements of his system are controversial at best and woefully inadequate at worst. He has a tendency to find in common morality what he himself put there, and his highly restricted conception of duties of assistance strikes this reader as ad hoc, inadequately defended, and unworthy of a project whose goal is to lessen the amount of misery in the world.
- Berlin, Isaiah. 1953. The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy’s view of history. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
- Gert, Bernard, C.M. Culver, and K.D. Clouser. 2006. Bioethics: A systematic approach, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Gert, Bernard. 2004. Common morality: Deciding what to do. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Gert, Bernard. 1998. (2005 rev. ed.) Morality: Its nature and justification. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Gert, Bernard. 1970. The moral rules: A new rational foundation for morality. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Gert, Bernard, and C.M. Culver. 1982. Philosophy in medicine: Conceptual and ethical issues in medicine and psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Gert, Bernard, C.M. Culver, and K.D. Clouser. 1997. Bioethics: A return to fundamentals. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Beauchamp, Tom L., and J.F. Childress. 1979, 1983, 1989, 1993, 2001, 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics, 1st–6th eds. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Beauchamp, Tom. 2003. A defense of the common morality. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13: 259–274. CrossRef
- Arras, John D. 2007. The way we reason now: Reflective equilibrium in bioethics. In The Oxford handbook of bioethics, ed. B. Steinbock, 46–71. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Daniels, Norman. 1996. Justice and justification: Reflective equilibrium in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kant, Immanuel. 1963. Lectures on ethics, trans. L. Infield. Indianapolis: Hackett.
- Hill, T.E. 1991. Servility and self-respect. In Autonomy and self respect, ed. T. Hill, 4–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Denis, L. 2002. Kant’s ethics and duties to oneself. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78: 321–348. CrossRef
- Brock, Dan W. 2001. Gert on the limits of morality’s requirements. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 435–440. CrossRef
- Gert, Bernard. 2001. Reply to Dan Brock. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 466–470.
- Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Mill, John S. 2002. Utilitarianism, ed. G. Sher. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.
- Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals, ed. M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Lomasky, Loren. 1987. Persons, rights, and the moral community. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Collier, P. 2008. The Bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Singer, Peter. 1999. Practical ethics, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Brooks, T. (ed.). 2008. The global justice reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- Scheffler, Samuel. 2001. Boundaries and allegiances: Problems of justice and responsibility in liberal thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Arras, John D. 2008. The Jewish chronic disease hospital case. In The Oxford textbook of research ethics, ed. E. Emanuel, et al., 73–79. New York: Oxford University Press.
- The hedgehog and the Borg: Common morality in bioethics
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
Volume 30, Issue 1 , pp 11-30
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Common morality
- Reflective equilibrium
- Moral justification
- Duties to others
- Moral change
- John D. Arras (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University of Virginia, 1515 Stoney Creek Dr., Charlottesville, VA, USA