Thinking across species—a critical bioethics approach to enhancement
- Richard Twine
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Drawing upon a concept of ‘critical bioethics’  this paper takes a species-broad approach to the social and ethical aspects of enhancement. Critical Bioethics aims to foreground interdisciplinarity, socio-political dimensions, as well as reflexivity to what becomes bioethical subject matter. This paper focuses upon the latter component and uses the example of animal enhancement as a way to think about both enhancement generally, and bioethics. It constructs several arguments for including animal enhancement as a part of enhancement debates, and considers some connections between human and animal enhancement. The paper concludes in a plea for an ‘enhancement’ to our critical abilities to examine some of the underlying social, moral and ethical assumptions bound up in varied anticipated ‘enhanced’ futures.
- Parens, E., ed. 1998a. Enhancing human traits—ethical and social implications. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Juengst, Eric. 1998. What does enhancement mean? In Enhancing human traits—ethical and social implications, ed. E. Parens. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Parens, E. 1998b. Is better always good? The enhancement project. In Enhancing human traits—ethical and social implications. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Brock, Dan. 1998. Enhancements of human function: Some distinctions for policymakers. In Enhancing human traits—ethical and social implications, ed. E. Parens. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Bostrom, Nick. 2005. In defense of posthuman dignity. Bioethics 19, no. 3: 202–214. CrossRef
- Hedgecoe, Adam. 2004. Critical bioethics: beyond the social science critique of applied ethics. Bioethics 18, no. 2: 120–143. CrossRef
- Twine, Richard. 2005. Constructing critical bioethics by deconstructing culture/nature dualism. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8, no. 3: 285–295. CrossRef
- Fox, Dennis, and Isaac Prilleltensky. 1997. Critical psychology: An introduction. London: Sage.
- Clarke, Adele. 1998. Disciplining reproduction—modernity, American life sciences, and the problems of sex. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
- Plumwood, Val. 1993. Feminism and the mastery of nature. London: Routledge.
- Twine, Richard. 2001. Ma(r)king essence: Ecofeminism and embodiment. Ethics and the Environment 6, no. 2: 31–58.
- Harris, John. 2004. On cloning. London: Routledge.
- Tang, Ya-Ping, et al. 1999. Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice. Nature 401, no. 6748: 63–69. CrossRef
- Lee, Sukho, et al. 2004. Viral expression of insulin-like growth factor-I enhances muscle hypertrophy in resistance-trained rats. Journal of Applied Physiology 96: 1097–1104. CrossRef
- Shumyatsky, Gleb, et al. 2005. Stathmin, a gene enriched in the amygdala, controls both learned and innate fear. Cell 123: 697–709. CrossRef
- Miah, Andy. 2004. Genetically modified athletes: Biomedical ethics, gene doping, and sport. London: Routledge.
- Hutson, Stu. 2005. Gene turn-off makes meek mice fearless. New Scientist, November 17,http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8337.html.
- Rauw, Wendy, et al. 1998. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: A review. Livestock Production Science 56: 15–33. CrossRef
- FABRE. 2005. Sustainable animal breeding and reproduction—a vision for 2025. The Farm Animal Breeding and Reproduction Technology Platform (FABRE-TP).
- Brown, Nik. 2003. Hope against hype—accountability in biopasts, presents, and futures. Science Studies 16, no. 2: 3–21.
- Williams, Bernard. 1995. Making sense of humanity—and other philosophical papers 1982–1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Organic Consumers Association. 2005. EPA rule loopholes allow pesticide testing on kids. Sept. 15, 2005: http://www.organicconsumers.org/school/loophole091605.cfm.
- Canton, James. 2004. Designing the future: NBIC technologies and human performance enhancement. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1013: 186–198. CrossRef
- Chadwick, Ruth, et al. 2003. Functional foods. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
- Jerez-Timaure, Nancy, et al. 2005. Fine mapping of QTL with major effect on weight and fat on distal mouse chromosome 2. Physiological Genomics 21: 411–422. CrossRef
- BBC. 2005. Genes can be ‘changed’ by foods. November 17. http://www.news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4441564.stm.
- Patterson, Charles. 2002. Eternal Treblinka—our treatment of animals and the Holocaust. New York: Lantern Books.
- Kimmelman, Barbara. 1983. The American Breeders Association: Genetics and eugenics in an agricultural context, 1903–13. Social Studies of Science 13, no. 2: 163–204. CrossRef
- Rajan, Kaushik. 2006. Biocapital—the constitution of postgenomic life. London: Duke University Press.
- Thinking across species—a critical bioethics approach to enhancement
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
Volume 28, Issue 6 , pp 509-523
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Ethical bypass
- Richard Twine (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. ESRC Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics (CESAGen), Lancaster University, IAS Building, County South, Lancaster, LA1 4YD, UK