“Merely a logician’s toy?” Belief revision confronting scientific theory change
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Over the past 50 years, theory change has been a central issue in the philosophy of science. While in the 1960s and 1970s it was investigated mainly within the historicist approaches worked out by Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend, Imre Lakatos and many others, starting from the end of the 1970s it has attracted the attention of an increasing number of philosophers with a logical and formal background. The conference devoted to The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change held in Helsinki in 1977 (cf. Niiniluoto and Tuomela 1979) can be considered as the starting point of this logical turn in the research on theory change. Within that conference, some new formal approaches were presented, including the structuralist view of scientific theories, the post-Popperian approaches to verisimilitude and (the logics of) belief revision. In the following decade, Carlos E. Alchourrón, Peter Gärdenfors and David Makinson developed their version of belief revision, commonly known as AGM. The central ...
- Alchourrón, Carlos E., Peter Gärdenfors, and David Makinson. 1985. On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50: 510–530. CrossRef
- Fermé, Eduardo, and Sven Ove Hansson. 2011. Twenty-five years of research in belief change. AGM 25 years. Journal of Philosophical Logic 40: 295–331. CrossRef
- Gärdenfors, Peter. 1988. Knowledge in flux: Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press/Bradford Book.
- Gärdenfors, Peter. 2011. Notes on the history of ideas behind AGM. Journal of Philosophical Logic 40: 115–120. CrossRef
- Hansson, Sven Ove. 1999. A textbook of belief dynamics: Theory change and database updating. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Niiniluoto, Ilkka. 1999. Belief Revision and Truthlikeness. In Internet Festschrift for Peter Gärdenfors, ed. Bengt Hansson et al. http://www.lucs.lu.se/spinning/.
- Niiniluoto, Ilkka, and Raimo Tuomela (eds.). 1979. The logic and epistemology of scientific change. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
- Rott, Hans. 2000. Two dogmas of belief revision. Journal of Philosophy 97: 503–522. CrossRef
- “Merely a logician’s toy?” Belief revision confronting scientific theory change
Volume 21, Issue 2 , pp 463-466
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, University of Bologna, via Zamboni 38, 40126, Bologna, Italy
- 3. Piazza Sassatelli 26, 41057, Spilamberto, MO, Italy
- 2. Department of Philosophy, Languages, and Literatures, University of Trieste, Androna Campo Marzio 10, 34123, Trieste, Italy