Adams, J., Merrill, S., & Grofman, B. (2005). A unified theory of party competition: a cross-national analysis integrating spatial and behavioral factors
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Alesina, A. (1988). Credibility and policy convergence in a two-party system with rational voters. American Economic Review, 78(4), 796–805.
Altemeyer, R. A. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ansolabehere, S., Iyengar, S., Simon, A., & Valentino, N. (1994). Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate? American Political Science Review, 88
Arceneaux, K. (2012). Cognitive biases and the strengths of political arguments. American Journal of Political Science, 56
Bartels, L. M. (1988). Presidential primaries and the dynamics of public choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Berry, S., Levinsohn, J., & Pakes, A. (1995). Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometric, 63
Bhadury, J., Griffin, P. M., Griffin, S. O., & Narasimhan, L. S. (1998). Finding the majority-rule equilibrium under lexicographic comparison of candidates. Social Choice and Welfare, 15
Brams, S. J., & Davis, M. D. (1974). The 3/2’s rule in presidential campaigning. American Political Science Review, 68
Calvert, R. (1985). Robustness of the multidimensional voting model: candidate motivations, uncertainty, and convergence. American Journal of Political Science, 29
Che, H., Iyer, G., & Shanmugam, R. (2007). Negative advertising and voter choice, working paper, University of Southern California.
Chen, Y., Narasimhan, C., & Zhang, Z. J. (2001). Individual marketing with imperfect targetability. Marketing Science, 20
Childers, T. L., & Rao, A. R. (1992). The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101
Cobb, M. D., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1997). Changing minds: political arguments and political persuasion. American Journal of Political Science, 41
Coughlin, P. J., & Nitzan, S. (1981). Electoral outcomes with probabilistic voting and Nash social welfare optima. Journal of Public Economics, 15
D’Aspremont, C., Gabszewicz, J. J., & Thisse, J.-F. (1979). On Hotelling’s ‘stability in competition’. Econometrica, 47
Degan, Arianna & Antonio Merlo (2009). A structural model of turnout and voting in multiple elections. University of Pennsylvania Working Paper.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65
Dubé, J. P., Sudhir, K., Ching, A., Crawford, G. S., Draganska, M., Hartmann, W., Hitsch, G., Viard, V. B., Villas-Boas, M., & Vilcassim, N. (2005). Recent advances in structural econometric modeling: dynamics, product positioning, and entry. Marketing Letters, 16
Economist, The (2010). Buying votes. June 19th, p. 71.
Erikson, R. S., & Palfrey, T. R. (2000). Equilibrium in campaign spending games: theory and data. American Political Science Review, 94
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425
Finkel, S., & Geer, J. (1998). A spot check: casting doubt on the demobilization effect of attack advertising. American Journal of Political Science, 42
Freedman, P., Franz, M., & Goldstein, K. (2004). Campaign advertising and democratic citizenship. American Journal of Political Science, 48
Gelman, A., & King, G. (1993). Why are american presidential election campaign polls so variable when votes are so predictable? British Journal of Political Science, 23
Gerber, A. (1998). Estimating the effect of campaign spending on senate election outcomes using instrumental variables. American Political Science Review, 92
Gerber, A. (2004). Does campaign spending work? Field experiments provide evidence and suggest new theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 47
Gerber, A., & Green, D. (2000). The effects of canvassing, phone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: a field experiment. American Political Science Review, 94
Gerber, A., Gimpel, J. G., Green, D. P., & Shaw, D. R. (2011). How large and long-lasting are the persuasive effects of televised campaign ads? Results from a randomized field experiment. American Political Science Review, 105
Goldstein, K., & Freedman, P. (2002). Campaign advertising and voter turnout: new evidence for a stimulation effect. Journal of Politics, 64(3), 721–740.
Gordon, B.R., & Hartmann, W. (2011a). .Advertising effects in presidential elections. Working paper, Columbia University.
Gordon, B.R., & Hartmann, W. (2011b). Political advertising and the Electoral College. Working paper, Columbia University.
Granberg, D., & Brent, E. (1983). When prophecy bends: the preference-expectation link in US presidential elections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45
Green, D., & Gerber, A. (2003). The underprovision of experiments in political science. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589
Green, D. P., & Krasno, J. S. (1988). Salvation for the spendthrift incumbent: reestimating the effects of campaign spending in house elections. American Journal of Political Science, 32
Groseclose, T. J. (2001). A model of candidate location when one candidate has a valence advantage. American Journal of Political Science, 45
Harrington, J. E., & Hess, G. D. (1996). A spatial theory of positive and negative campaigning. Games and Economic Behavior, 17
Hedgcock, W., Rao, A. R., & Chen, H. (2009). Could Ralph Nader’s entrance and exit have helped Al Gore? The impact of decoy dynamics on consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 46
(3), 330–343. June.CrossRef
Hillygus, D. S., & Shields, T. G. (2008). The persuadable voter: wedge issues in presidential campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hoegg, M., & Lewis M. (2012). The impact of candidate appearance and advertising strategies on election outcomes? Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 895–909.
Holbrook, T. M. (1994). Campaigns, national conditions, and U.S. presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 38
Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. The Economic Journal, 39
Huber, G. A., & Arceneaux, K. (2007). Identifying the persuasive effects of presidential advertising. American Journal of Political Science, 51
Jacobson, G. C. (1978). The effects of campaign spending in congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 72
Jost, J. T., & Sidanius, J. (2004). Political psychology. New York: Psychology Press.
Kim, H., Rao, A. R., & Lee, A. Y. (2009). It’s time to vote: the effect of matching message orientation and temporal frame on political persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 35
Klein, J., & Ahluwalia, R. (2005). Negativity in the evaluation of political candidates. Journal of Marketing, 69
Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1994). The truly false consensus effect: an ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67
Lau, R. R., Sigelman, L., Heldman, C., & Babbitt, P. (1999). The effects of negative political advertisements: a meta-analytic assessment. American Political Science Review, 93
Lau, R. R., Sigelman, L., & Rovner, I. B. (2007). The effects of negative political campaigns: a meta-analytic reassessment. The Journal of Politics, 69
Levitt, S. D. (1994). Using repeat challengers to estimate the effect of campaign spending on election outcomes in the U.S. senate. Journal of Political Economy, 102
Lin, T. M., Enelow, J. M., & Dorussen, H. (1999). Equilibrium in multi-candidate probabilistic voting. Public Choice, 98
Lovett, M., & Peress, M. (2010). Targeting political advertisements on television. Working paper, University of Rochester.
Lovett, M., & Shachar, R. (2010). Integrated marketing communications in political marketing: an empirical study of presidential campaigns in 2000 and 2004. Working Paper, Duke University.
Lovett, M., & Shachar, R. (2011). The seeds of negativity: knowledge and money. Marketing Science, 30
Moorthy, S. (2010). Strategic considerations in political advertising. Working Paper, University of Toronto.
Orhun, Y., & Urminsky, O. (2012). Conditional projection: How own evaluations impact beliefs about others whose choices are known. Ross School of Business Paper No. 1166.
Phillips, J., Urbany, J., & Reynolds, T. (2008). Confirmation and the effects of valenced political advertising: a field experiment. Journal of Consumer Research, 34
Quattrone, G. A., & Tversky, A. (1988). Contrasting rational and psychological analysis of political choice. American Political Science Review, 82(3), 719–736.
Ridout, Travis, N., & Michael Franz. (2010). Using advertising as a window on campaign message targeting. Working Paper, Washington State University.
Rossi, P. E., McCulloch, R. E., & Allenby, G. M. (1996). The value of purchase history data in target marketing. Marketing Science, 15
Rothschild, M. (1978). Political advertising: a neglected policy issue in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 15
Schofield, N. (2003). Valence competition in the spatial stochastic model. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15, 371–383.
Shachar, R. (2003). Party loyalty as habit formation. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18
Shachar, R. (2009). The political participation puzzle and marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 46
Shachar, R., & Nalebuff, B. (1999). Follow the leader: theory and evidence on political participation. American Economic Review, 89
Shiv, B., Edell, J., & Payne, J. (1997). Factors affecting the impact of negatively and positively framed ad messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 24
Skaperdas, S., & Grofman, B. (1995). Modeling negative campaigning. American Political Science Review, 89
Snyder, J. M. (1989). Election goals and the allocation of campaign resources. Econometrica, 57
Soberman, D.A. (2010). Exploiting (neutralizing) an advantage in a political campaign. Working paper, University of Toronto.
Soberman, D. A., & Sadoulet, L. (2007). Campaign spending limits and political advertising. Management Science, 53
Stokes, S. C. (2005). Perverse accountability: a formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review, 99