Marketing Letters

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 661–669

Battle royal: Zero-price effect vs relative vs referent thinking

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11002-012-9169-2

Cite this article as:
Nicolau, J.L. Mark Lett (2012) 23: 661. doi:10.1007/s11002-012-9169-2
  • 1.1k Downloads

Abstract

This article confronts three psychological influences: relative thinking, referent thinking, and the zero-price effect. The experiment conducted in the context of bundles with complementary components, confirms previous evidence around the dominance patterns between relative and referent thinking when the bargain is a discount; however, when the discount is changed to a free product (worth the same as the discount), the zero-price effect arises. Specifically: (1) if actual price coincides with expected price, relative thinking is the norm, unless the zero-price effect appears; (2) if actual price moderately deviates from expected price, referent thinking is superior to any other effects, relative thinking and the zero-price effect; and (3) if the deviation is extreme, a battle royal among influences takes place: relative thinking beats referent thinking as long as the zero-price effect does not appear. If the zero-price effect is present, it will cancel referent thinking and reverse relative thinking.

Keywords

Relative thinking Referent thinking Zero-price effect 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Marketing, Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of AlicanteAlicanteSpain

Personalised recommendations