Skip to main content
Log in

Approximate results for rainbow labelings

  • Published:
Periodica Mathematica Hungarica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple graph \(G=(V,\,E)\) is said to be antimagic if there exists a bijection \(f{\text {:}}\,E\rightarrow [1,\,|E|]\) such that the sum of the values of f on edges incident to a vertex takes different values on distinct vertices. The graph G is distance antimagic if there exists a bijection \(f{\text {:}}\,V\rightarrow [1,\, |V|],\) such that \(\forall x,\,y\in V,\)

$$\begin{aligned} \sum _{x_i\in N(x)}f\left( x_i\right) \ne \sum _{x_j\in N(y)}f\left( x_j\right) . \end{aligned}$$

Using the polynomial method of Alon we prove that there are antimagic injections of any graph G with n vertices and m edges in the interval \([1,\,2n+m-4]\) and, for trees with k inner vertices, in the interval \([1,\,m+k].\) In particular, a tree all of whose inner vertices are adjacent to a leaf is antimagic. This gives a partial positive answer to a conjecture by Hartsfield and Ringel. We also show that there are distance antimagic injections of a graph G with order n and maximum degree \(\Delta \) in the interval \([1,\,n+t(n-t)],\) where \( t=\min \{\Delta ,\,\lfloor n/2\rfloor \},\) and, for trees with k leaves, in the interval \([1,\, 3n-4k].\) In particular, all trees with \(n=2k\) vertices and no pairs of leaves sharing their neighbour are distance antimagic, a partial solution to a conjecture of Arumugam.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Alon, Combinatorial Nullstellensatz. Comb. Probab. Comput. 8, 7–29 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Alon, Additive Latin transversals. Isr. J. Math. 117, 125–130 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. N. Alon, G. Kaplan, A. Lev, Y. Roditty, R. Yuster, Dense graphs are antimagic. J. Graph Theory 47(4), 297–309 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Arumugam, personal communication (2012)

  5. M. Bača, M. Miller, Super Edge-Antimagic Graphs: A Wealth of Problems and Some Solutions (BrownWalker Press, Boca Raton, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Bollobás, O. Pikhurko, Integer sets with prescribed pairwise differences being distinct. Eur. J. Comb. 26(5), 607–616 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. P.D. Chawathe, V. Krishna, Antimagic Labeling of Complete m-Ary Trees, Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics, Trends in Mathematics (Birkhäuser, Basel, 2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Cheng, Lattice grids and prisms are antimagic. Theor. Comput. Sci. 374(1–3), 66–73 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Cheng, A new class of antimagic Cartesian product graphs. Discrete Math. 308(24), 6441–6448 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. D.W. Cranston, Regular bipartite graphs are antimagic. J. Graph Theory 60(3), 173–182 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. J.A. Gallian, A dynamic survey of graph labeling. Electron. J. Comb. Dyn. Surv. # DS6 Eighteen Edition (2015)

  12. N. Hartsfield, G. Ringel, Pearls in Graph Theory (Academic, Boston, 1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Hefetz, Anti-magic graphs via the combinatorial NullStellenSatz. J. Graph Theory 50(4), 263–272 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. G. Kaplan, A. Lev, Y. Roditty, On zero-sum partitions and anti-magic trees. Discrete Math. 309, 2010–2014 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. R.N. Karasev, F.V. Petrov, Partitions of nonzero elements of a finite field into pairs. Isr. J. Math. 192, 143–156 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Lladó, S.C. López, J. Moragas, Every tree is a large subtree of a tree that decomposes \(K_n\) or \(K_{n,\,n}\). Discrete Math. 310, 838–842 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Miller, C. Rodger, R. Simantujak, Distance magic labelings of graphs. Australas. J. Comb. 28, 305–315 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Ryan, O. Phanalasy, M. Miller, L.J. Rylands, in Combinatorial Algorithms, ed. by C.S. Iliopoulos, W.F. smyth. On Antimagic Labeling for Generalized Web and Flower Graphs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6460 (Springer, London, 2010), pp. 303–313

  19. T.-M. Wang, in Toroidal Grids are Antimagic. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Computing and Combinatorics Conference, COCOON’2005. LNCS, vol. 3595 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2005), pp. 671–679

  20. T.-M. Wang, C.C. Hsiao, On anti-magic labeling for graph products. Discrete Math. 308(16), 3624–3633 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Zhang, X. Sun, The antimagicness of the Cartesian product of graphs. Theor. Comput. Sci. 410(8–10), 727–735 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to one of the referees for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Lladó.

Additional information

Mirka Miller passed away in January 2016. This paper was written during successive meetings with Mirka in Jakarta, Bandung, Barcelona and Vientiane. After a long friendship full of mathematical discussions, this is the only mathematical paper that the two of us wrote together, not knowing that it would also be the last one. It is with a mixing of happiness and sorrow that I can eventually see it in print.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lladó, A., Miller, M. Approximate results for rainbow labelings. Period Math Hung 74, 11–21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10998-016-0151-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10998-016-0151-2

Keywords

Navigation