UpStart Parent Survey: A New Psychometrically Valid Tool for the Evaluation of Prevention-focused Parenting Programs
Parents are the most significant influence on the growth and development of young children. All parents can increase their knowledge of developmental milestones and parenting practices by participating in effective programs that offer information and support. However, there is limited outcome evaluation of programs offering these services. Prevention-focused parenting programs (P-FPPs) are key frontline services designed to educate parents and improve the overall well-being of children. Evaluation of these programs is currently weak; this is not to say they are ineffective, rather that their effectiveness has been poorly evaluated. Rigorous evaluation of P-FPPs would support informed funding and evidence-based policy decisions. The purpose of this study was to conduct a preliminary psychometric analysis of the UpStart Parent Survey (USPS)—a tool developed specifically for evaluating this type of program. Preliminary analysis revealed uni-dimensionality of each scale, strong internal consistency and temporal stability, as well as strong concurrent validity on 9 of the 11 items examined with an urban Canadian population. In its first round of psychometric evaluation, the USPS demonstrated promise as a brief, easy to administer, scientifically rigorous tool for the evaluation of prevention-focused parenting programs.
Supplementary Material (0)
- McLennan, J. D., MacMillan, H. L., & Jamieson, E. (2004). Canada’s programs to prevent mental health problems in children: The research practice gap. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 171(9), 1069–1071. CrossRef
- McLennan, J. D., & Lavis, J. N. (2006). What is the evidence for parenting interventions offered in a Canadian Community? Canadian Journal of Public Health, 97(6), 454–458.
- Karoly, L. A., Kilburn, M. R., & Bigelow, J. H., et al. (2001). Assessing costs and benefits of early childhood intervention programs: Overview and application to the Starting Early Starting Smart Program. Executive Summary. Seattle, WA: Casey Family Programs.
- Temple, J. A., & Reynolds, A. J. (2007). Benefits and costs of investments in preschool education: Evidence from the Child–Parent Centers and related programs. Economics of Education Review, 26, 126–144. CrossRef
- National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. (2010). The foundations of lifelong health are built in early childhood. Boston, MA: Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University.
- Rikhy, S., Tough, S., Trute, B., et al. (2010). Gauging knowledge of developmental milestones among Albertan adults: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 183–191. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-183. CrossRef
- Benzies, K., & Mychasiuk, R. (2009). Fostering family resiliency: A review of the key protective factors. Child & Family Social Work, 14, 103–114. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00586.x. CrossRef
- Benzies, K., Trute, B., & Worthington, C., et al. (2010) Assessing psychological well-being in mothers of children with disabilities: Evaluation of the Parenting Morale Index and Family Impact of Childhood Disability Scale. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. Advanced Access: September 15, 2010.
- Bloomfield, L., & Kendall, S. (2007). Testing a parenting programme evaluation tool as a pre- and post-course measure of parenting self-efficacy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(5), 487–493. CrossRef
- Abidin, R. R. (1997). Parenting Stress Index: A measure of the parent–child system. In C. P. Zalaquett & R. J. Wood (Eds.), Evaluating stress: A book of resources (pp. 277–291). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
- Wyatt Kaminski, J., Valle, A. L., Filene, J. H., et al. (2008). A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 567–589. CrossRef
- Alberta Centre for Child Family & Community Research. (2007). Common outcomes initiative: Roundtable final report. Edmonton, AB: Author.
- Allison, K. R., & Yoshida, K. K. (1989). Increasing response rates in community health surveys administered by telephone. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 80, 67–70.
- Howard, G. S., Ralph, K. M., Gulanick, N. A., et al. (1979). Internal validity in pretest–posttest, self-report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pretests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3(1), 1–23. CrossRef
- Conger, R. D., Patterson, G. R., & Ge, X. (1995). It takes two to replicate: A mediational model for the impact of parents’ stress on adolescent adjustment. Child Development, 66(1), 80–97. CrossRef
- 3 Cheers for the Early Years. (June 12, 2009). Parenting Needs Assessment: Final Report. Calgary, AB: Author.
- Griner Hill, L., & Betz, D. (2005). Revisiting the retrospective pretest. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(4), 501–517. CrossRef
- Skinner, H. A., Steinhauer, P., & Santa-Barbara, J. (1995). FAM-III manual. Toronto, ON: Multi-health Systems.
- Trute, B., & Hiebert-Murphy, D. (2005). Predicting family adjustment and parenting stress in childhood: Disability services using brief assessment tools. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 30(4), 217–225. CrossRef
- Dunst, C. J., Jenkins, V., & Trivette, C. M. (1984). The family support scale: Reliability and validity. Journal of Individual, Family and Community Wellness, 1, 45–52.
- Hanley, B., Tasse, M., Aman, M. G., et al. (1998). Psychometric properties of the Family Support Scale with Head Start families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 7(1), 69–77. CrossRef
- Ware, J., & Sherbourne, C. (1992). The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483. CrossRef
- Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., Dewey, J. E., et al. (2001). SF-8 Health survey manual—how to score and interpret single-item health measures: A manual for users of the SF-8 health survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated.
- Kazdin, A. E. (2003). Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
- Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
- Lamb, T. (2005). The retrospective pretest: An imperfect but useful tool. The Evaluation Exchange, 11(2), 18–19.
About this Article
- UpStart Parent Survey: A New Psychometrically Valid Tool for the Evaluation of Prevention-focused Parenting Programs
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Volume 17, Issue 8 , pp 1452-1458
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Child development
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- 2. Department of Child and Youth Studies, Mount Royal University, Calgary, AB, Canada
- 3. Provincial Early Childhood Team, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada