Incidence of Severe Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: Use of a Composite Indicator in a Population Cohort
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The aim was to develop a composite outcome indicator to identify infants with severe adverse outcomes in routinely collected population health datasets, and assess the indicator’s association with readmission and infant mortality rates. A comprehensive list of diagnoses and procedures indicative of serious neonatal morbidity was compiled based on literature review, validation studies and expert consultation. Relevant diagnoses and procedures indicative of severe morbidity that are reliably reported were analysed and reviewed, and the neonatal adverse outcome indicator (NAOI) was refined. Data were obtained from linked birth and hospital data for 516,843 liveborn infants ≥24 weeks gestation, in New South Wales, Australia from 2001 to 2006. Face validity of the indicator was examined by calculating the relative risks (and 95% CI) of hospital readmission or death in the first year of life of those infants identified by the NAOI. Overall 4.6% of all infants had one or more conditions included in the NAOI; 35.4% of preterm infants and 2.4% of term infants. Infants identified by the composite indicator were 10 times more likely to die in the first year of life and twice as likely to be readmitted to hospital in the first year of life compared to infants not identified by the NAOI. The NAOI can reliably identify infants with a severe adverse neonatal outcome and can be used to monitor trends, assess obstetric and neonatal interventions and the quality of perinatal care in a uniform and cost-effective way.
- Martin, J. A., et al. (2008). Annual summary of vital statistics: 2006. Pediatrics, 121(4), 788–801. CrossRef
- Pattinson, R. C., et al. (2005). Critical incident audit and feedback to improve perinatal and maternal mortality and morbidity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2005(4), CD002961.
- Fox, N., et al. (2010). Active second-stage management in twin pregnancies undergoing planned vaginal delivery in a US population. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 115(2), 229–233. CrossRef
- American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Committee on Obstetric Practice. (2006). The Apgar score. Pediatrics, 117(4), 1444–1447.
- Crowther, C. A., et al. (2006). Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome after repeat exposure to antenatal corticosteroids: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 367(9526), 1913–1919. CrossRef
- Alexander, J. M., et al. (2007). Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109(4), 917–921. CrossRef
- Wilmink, F. A., et al. (2010). Neonatal outcome following elective cesarean section beyond 37 weeks of gestation: A 7 year retrospective analysis of a national registry. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 202(3), 250 e1–250 e8. CrossRef
- Tita, A. T., et al. (2009). Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(2), 111–120. CrossRef
- Bastek, J. A., et al. (2008). Adverse neonatal outcomes: Examining the risks between preterm, late preterm, and term infants. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 199(4), 367 e1–367 e8. CrossRef
- Novicoff, W. M., et al. (2000). Initial development of a system-wide maternal-fetal outcomes assessment program. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 183(2), 291–300. CrossRef
- Verma, A., et al. (1999). Morbidity assessment index for newborns: A composite tool for measuring newborn health. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 181(3), 701–708. CrossRef
- Northam, S., & Knapp, T. R. (2006). The reliability and validity of birth certificates. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 35(1), 3–12. CrossRef
- Kirby, R. S. (2001). Invited commentary: Using vital statistics databases for perinatal epidemiology: Does the quality go in before the name goes on? American Journal of Epidemiology, 154(10), 889–890. CrossRef
- Joseph, K. S., & Fahey, J. (2009). Validation of perinatal data in the discharge abstract database of the Canadian institute for health information. Chronic diseases in Canada, 29(3), 96–100.
- Ford, J. B., et al. (2007). Using hospital discharge data for determining neonatal morbidity and mortality: A validation study. BMC Health Services Research, 7, 188. CrossRef
- Taylor, L. K., et al. (2005). How useful are hospital morbidity data for monitoring conditions occurring in the perinatal period? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 45(1), 36–41. CrossRef
- Lain, S. J., et al. (2010). Quality of data in perinatal population health databases: A systematic review. Medical Care Applied Methodology Series. (Accepted 25 March 2011).
- Roberts, C. L., et al. (2008). Measuring maternal morbidity in routinely collected health data: Development and validation of a maternal morbidity outcome indicator. Medical Care, 46(8), 786–794. CrossRef
- DiGiuseppe, D. L., et al. (2002). Reliability of birth certificate data: A multi-hospital comparison to medical records information. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 6(3), 169–179. CrossRef
- Gissler, M., et al. (1995). Data quality after restructuring a national medical registry. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 23(1), 75–80.
- Roohan, P. J., et al. (2003). Validation of birth certificate data in New York State. Journal of Community Health, 28(5), 335–346. CrossRef
- Laws, P. J., & Sullivan, E. A. (2005). Australia’s mothers and babies 2003. Sydney: AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit.
- Shand, A. W., et al. (2008). Outcomes of pregnancies in women with pre-gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational diabetes mellitus; A population-based study in New South Wales, Australia, 1998–2002. Diabetic Medicine, 25(6), 708–715. CrossRef
- Pink, B. (2010). An introduction to socio-economic indexes for areas(SEIFA) 2006. In Census of population and housing information paper. 2003, ABS: Canberra. p. http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/D729075E079F9FDECA2574170011B088/$File/20390_2006.pdf. (Accessed 8 November 2010).
- Roberts, C. L., & Lancaster, P. A. (1999). Australian national birthweight percentiles by gestational age. Medical Journal of Australia, 170(3), 114–118.
- Anim-Somuah, M., Smyth, R., & Howell, C. (2005). Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database of systematic reviews, 2005(4), CD000331.
- Heimstad, R., et al. (2006). Outcomes of pregnancy beyond 37 weeks of gestation. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 108(3 Pt 1), 500–508. CrossRef
- McLaurin, K. K., et al. (2009). Persistence of morbidity and cost differences between late-preterm and term infants during the first year of life. Pediatrics, 123(2), 653–659. CrossRef
- Shapiro-Mendoza, C. K., et al. (2006). Risk factors for neonatal morbidity and mortality among “healthy”, late preterm newborns. Seminars in Perinatol, 30(2), 54–60. CrossRef
- Ellberg, L., et al. (2008). Maternity care options influence readmission of newborns. Acta Paediatrica, 97(5), 579–583. CrossRef
- Engle, W. A., Tomashek, K. M., & Wallman, C. (2007). “Late-preterm” infants: A population at risk. Pediatrics, 120(6), 1390–1401. CrossRef
- Westert, G. P., et al. (2002). An international study of hospital readmissions and related utilization in Europe and the USA. Health Policy, 61(3), 269–278. CrossRef
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2004). Australia’s babies: Their health and wellbeing. In Bulletin, Issue 21. Canberra: Australian Government.
- McIntire, D. D., et al. (1999). Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. New England Journal of Medicine, 340(16), 1234–1238. CrossRef
- Halfon, P., et al. (2006). Validation of the potentially avoidable hospital readmission rate as a routine indicator of the quality of hospital care. Medical Care, 44(11), 972–981. CrossRef
- Incidence of Severe Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: Use of a Composite Indicator in a Population Cohort
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Volume 16, Issue 3 , pp 600-608
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Neonatal morbidity
- Outcome measure
- Administrative data
- International classification of diseases
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal North Shore Hospital, c/-, Level 2, Building 52, St Leonards, 2065, Australia
- 2. Department of Neonatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia