Comparing Maternal Child Health Problems and Outcomes Across Public Health Nursing Agencies
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
To use aggregated data from health informatics systems to identify needs of maternal and child health (MCH) clients served by county public health agencies and to demonstrate outcomes of services provided. Participating agencies developed and implemented a formal standardized classification data comparison process using structured Omaha System data. An exploratory descriptive analysis of the data was performed. Summary reports of aggregated and analyzed data from records of clients served and discharged in 2005 were compared. Client problems and outcomes were found to be similar across agencies, with behavioral, psychosocial, environmental and physiological problems identified and addressed. Differential improvement was noted by problem, outcome measure, and agency; and areas for enhancing intervention strategies were prioritized. Problems with greatest improvement across agencies were Antepartum/postpartum and Family planning, and least improvement across agencies were Neglect and Substance use. Findings demonstrated that public health nurses address many serious health-related problems with low-income high-risk MCH clients. MCH client needs were found to be similar across agencies. Public health nurse home visiting services addressed important health issues with MCH clients, and statistically significant improvement in client health problems occurred consistently across agencies. The data comparison processes developed in this project were useful for MCH programs, and may be applicable to other program areas using structured client data for evaluation purposes. Using informatics tools and data facilitated needs assessment, program evaluation, and outcomes management processes for the agencies, and will continue to play an integral role in directing practice and improving client outcomes.
- Goetzel, R. Z., Ozminkowski, R. J., Pelletier, K. R., Metz, R. D., & Chapman, L. S. (2007, September/October). Emerging trends in health and productivity management. The art of health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 1–8.
- Monsen, K. A., Fitzsimmons, L. L., Lescenski, B. A., Lytton, A. B., Schwichtenberg, L. D., & Martin, K. S. (2006). A public health nursing informatics data-and-practice quality project. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 24, 152–158. doi:10.1097/00024665-200605000-00012. CrossRef
- Martin, K. S. (2005). The Omaha System: A key to practice, documentation, and information management (2nd ed.). St. Louis: Elsevier.
- Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the quality of medical care. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 442, 166–206. doi:10.2307/3348969. CrossRef
- United States 2000 Census. (2002). Ranking tables for counties by race alone, race alone or in combination, and two or more races populations. Accessed February 11, 2009, from http://www.censusu.gov/population/www/cen2000/briefs/phc-t14/index.html.
- Martin, K. S., Elfrink, V., & Monsen, K. A. (2008). Omaha System overview and components. Accessed November 8, 2008, from http://www.omahasystem.org/systemo.htm.
- Martin, K. S., Norris, J., & Leak, G. K. (1999). Psychometric analysis of the Problem Rating Scale for Outcomes. Outcomes Management for Nursing Practice, 3, 20–25.
- Martin, K. S., & Scheet, N. J. (1992). The Omaha System: Applications for community health nursing. Philadelphia: Saunders.
- Bowles, K. H. (2005). Use of the Omaha System in research. In K. S. Martin (Ed.), The Omaha System: A key to practice, documentation, and information management (2nd ed., pp. 105–136). St. Louis: Elsevier.
- Monsen, K. A. (2005). Use of the Omaha System in practice. In K. S. Martin (Ed.), The Omaha System: A key to practice, documentation, and information management (2nd ed., pp. 58–83). St. Louis: Elsevier.
- Minnesota Omaha System Users Group. (2009). Care plans and practice tools. Accessed February 11, 2009, from http://omahasystemmn.org/KBS_care_plans.htm.
- Lindsay, B. (2004). Randomized controlled trials of socially complex nursing interventions: Creating bias and unreliability? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45, 84–94. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02864.x. CrossRef
- Barnard, K. E. (1998, February/March). Developing, implementing, and documenting interventions with parents and young children. Zero to Three, 23-29.
- Olds, D. L. (2002). Prenatal and infancy home visiting by nurses: From randomized trials to community replication. Prevention Science, 3, 153–172. doi:10.1023/A:1019990432161. CrossRef
- Isaac, S., & Michael, W. B. (1995). Handbook in research and evaluation (3rd ed.). San Diego: EdITS.
- Comparing Maternal Child Health Problems and Outcomes Across Public Health Nursing Agencies
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Volume 14, Issue 3 , pp 412-421
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Needs assessment
- Omaha System
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University of Minnesota School of Nursing, 5-160 Weaver-Densford Hall, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
- 2. Saint Paul - Ramsey County Public Health, 90 West Plato Boulevard, St. Paul, MN, 55107, USA
- 3. Dakota County Public Health, 1 Mendota Rd W Ste 410, West St. Paul, MN, 55118-4771, USA
- 4. Scott County Public Health, 200 Fourth Ave West, Shakopee, MN, 55379, USA
- 5. Martin Associates, Omaha, NE, USA