Accessibility of Family Planning Services: Impact of Structural and Organizational Factors
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Objectives: This study sought to determine whether selected structural and organizational characteristics of publicly available family planning facilities are associated with greater availability.
Methods: A survey was sent to 726 publicly available family planning facilities in four states. These included local health departments, federally qualified health centers (FQHC), Planned Parenthood sites, hospital outpatient departments, and freestanding women’s health centers. Usable responses were obtained from 526 sites for a response rate of 72.5%. Availability variables included the provision of primary care services; the contraceptives offered; professional staffing; scheduling, waiting time, and transportation; and cultural congruence and competency. The structural and organizational variables were state, type of organization, and funding source.
Results: Some states were more likely to offer emergency contraception while others were more likely to have weekend hours. FQHCs were most likely to provide primary care and Planned Parenthood sites most likely to offer emergency contraception. Title X funding was associated with increased likelihood of providing emergency contraception and staffing by midlevel practitioners and registered nurses.
Conclusions: This study found that availability varied by structural and organizational variables, many of which are determined by federal and state policies. Revising some of these policies might increase utilization of family planning facilities.
- Institute of Medicine. Access to Health Care in America. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1993.
- Goodman DC, Klerman LV, Johnson KA, Chang C, Marth N. Geographic Access to Family Planning Facilities and the Risk of Unintended and Teenage Pregnancy. Matern Child Health J. (refernce to be filled in)
- Cutright, P, Jaffee, FS (1977) Impact of Family Planning Programs on Fertility. The U.S. Experience. Praeger Publishers, New York, NY
- Torres, A, Forrest, JD (1987) Family Planning Clinic Services n U.S. Counties, 1983. Fam Plann Perspec 19: pp. 54-8 CrossRef
- Averett, SL, Rees, DI, Argys, LM (2002) The Impact of Government Policies and Neighborhood Characteristics on Teenage Sexual Activity and Contraceptive Use. Am J Public Health 92: pp. 1773-9 CrossRef
- Chandra A, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, Abma JC, Jones J. Fertility, Family Planning, and Reproductive Health of U.S. Women: Data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Hyattsville, MD, National Center for Health Statistics, 2005.
- Frost, JJ, Frohwirth, L, Purcell, A (2004) The Availability and Use of Publicly Funded Family Planning Clinics: U.S. Trends, 1994–2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 36: pp. 206-15 CrossRef
- Lindberg, LD, Frost, JJ, Sten, C, Dailard, C (2006) The Provision and Funding of Contraceptive Services at Publicly Funded Family Planning Agencies: 1995–2003. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 38: pp. 37-45 CrossRef
- Sonenstein, FL, Punia, S, Scarcella, CA (2004) Future Directions for Family Planning Research: A Framework for Title X Family Planning Service Delivery Improvement Research. Urban Institute, Washington, DC,
- Gold RB. Doing More for Less: Study Says State Medicaid Family Planning Expansions are Cost-Effective. The Guttmacher Report on Public Policy 2004:7.
- Brindis, CD, Llewelyn, L, Marie, K, Blum, M, Biggs, A, Maternowska, C (2003) Meeting the Reproductive Health Care Needs of Adolescents. California’s Family Planning, Access, Care, and Treatment Program. J Adoles Health 325: pp. 79-90 CrossRef
- McFarlane, DR, Meier, KJ (2001) The Politics of Fertility Control. Seven Bridges Press, New York, NY
- Johnson KA, Posner, SF, Biermann J, Cordero J, Atrash HK, Parker CS, Boulet S, Curtis MG. Recommendations to Improve Preconception Health and Health Care—United States. A Report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care. MMWR 2006;55: No. RR-6.
- Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation and Alan Guttmacher Institute. Medicaid: A Critical Source of Support for Family Planning in the United States. Issue Brief, April 2005.
- Alan Guttmacher Institute. Insurance Coverage of Contraceptives. State Policies in Brief. February 14, 2006. Accesses at: http:/www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/February 28, 2006.
- Abma J, Chandra A, Mosher W, Peterson L, Piccinino L. Fertility, Family Planning, and Women’s Health: New Data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Hyattsville, MD, National Center for Health Statistics, 1997.
- Accessibility of Family Planning Services: Impact of Structural and Organizational Factors
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Volume 11, Issue 1 , pp 19-26
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Family planning
- Unintended births
- Teenage births
- Community health centers
- Title X
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Institute for Child, Youth and Family Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02454-9110, USA
- 2. The Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences and the Department of Pediatrics, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA
- 3. Dartmouth Medical School, 7251 Strasenburgh Hall, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA